From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAAAED99 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 130DE1279E for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:21:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fcd615d7d6so1119548e87.3 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 05:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689855667; x=1690460467; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=G/FED2Y9KZF2n0v6HnAUlq/G4W3hS4P57jB99ANe93M=; b=ZziclB3jnHZBlSg1g3SyP4n3WXlgjnnVbj5LbK3qke1C7igMLfETUiSHI4pkGyZUYq jKcpemu2g7U8OCDCNC5fR+hb2RGkiXzgsATWBbTYm8N/v+OeFL3d/AYq0LjUB6k6MG5M aeRL59SB9V4Ab6gRdO6VvlJcR8H+O77b6QvXx5TSbpjZhb95QahsqYOKUbgbg55+yh6d X9SFWwOSZQhdcWEo3kz/REC55F+kestZQYf4JhBT4kFFNqnpkuQgEb3p26wySSFpSEym C4hWpjxbjyglV+4OA2ZGWPLZzBRGCI5QTbeey2pHie2pYq6v6QN0Jf9TAhXPnqrCTRE3 F9kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689855667; x=1690460467; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G/FED2Y9KZF2n0v6HnAUlq/G4W3hS4P57jB99ANe93M=; b=X+WM+YeOBPE8tBaWkEbPpGjmDuhbcoolwZ3gbkagQ5cCi6TKKyrTV0VOK8kIrWwGfn ZBaMtzMIpw7pBtlPpKqwKIQWaFn27vffgyTTJxylGux0xwzAnW5sdEuZWSQabav6HMvO Ihl286UkuBB9HDFGKSBD/ZMCaqvfyfWsaLGYq/t4eQPVKy4ky50SgsNCUL8nATusRaYd ZRxYzMHVFmDCOfV5oMJsApL1JgoURyf99k7YjaVxH6HfGZSw7C6aTD7vb3AI1E2duGJf T6L5Kn/33Ib5TMYiWiYsLVCBYvyonKSnhLCj7iIZ/yIm7g37IGJOpKPsF/3ngwDXsV21 be0A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZqxaM+e7/dFM1aicY2TcUKIkpwvp532DHlk1pMosRtQ5WkYyd1 i8n5oAc5v+7NHtwo1UNxyIGVOlLdU1g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFNNSZNtexfuAiMWpG+0U7iCrqioQIHd8LS2ZRVAxmcmMaC2SpQOLZcGyXB+xY5uIsV4wIeGA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:4f4b:0:b0:4f8:74b5:b4ec with SMTP id a11-20020a194f4b000000b004f874b5b4ecmr2013104lfk.41.1689855666620; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 05:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a280:2d80:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a280:2d80:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x21-20020a05600c21d500b003fb41491670sm3788793wmj.24.2023.07.20.05.21.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 05:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2b5b83bb-c90e-b6dd-4b15-a57414b42542@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:21:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE, en-US To: PVE User List From: Uwe Sauter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.187 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [PVE-User] DeviceMapper devices get filtered by Proxmox X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:21:14 -0000 Dear all, I'd like to use some existing hardware to create a Ceph cluster. Unfortunately, all my external disks are filtered by the WebUI and by pceceph command which prevents using them as OSD disks. My servers are connected to a SAS-JBOD containing 60 SAS-HDDs. The connection is done via 2 dual-port SAS-HBAs, each port connecting to both of the JBOD controllers. This means that all my external disks can be reached via four SAS-path and thus I see 240 disks in /dev. (Actually, I see 244 /dev/sd* devices as there are also 4 internal disks for the OS…) Using multipathd, each disk with its four entries in /dev is available a fifth time in /dev/mapper/${WWN} which is a symlink to /dev/dm-${NUMBER}. Both /dev/dm-${NUMBER} and /dev/mapper/${WWN} entries are filtered by Proxmox. Is there a way to remove this filter or to define my own set of filters? Using the /dev/sd* entries would be possible but I would loose the redundancy provided by multipathd. Regards, Uwe