From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E20C872D33 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 04:11:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D835A23D24 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 04:11:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-xc36.google.com (mail-oo1-xc36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5039523D10 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 04:11:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-xc36.google.com with SMTP id s4-20020a4ac804000000b0040e93a35508so1119736ooq.8 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:11:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wolfspyre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=0aJLnOB+2U9AQCKGJ2hiiqnCeefXpXts17esEHUfr3Y=; b=Tf5HXXv31a6h/lTuQ/3H2vM4SbE1fb3wTGgeamLrEoyFHtDUm6z/LipVjHvJXQIYtC 0eK7yLE/yy9aEgAgcBZBqW+iSPNfVsOxQjMpGpuedsHbkH10MBl5/TrazOT56FjaW1kG GVe0WNevuKfqvWK9nx6DdDKc6DMdkiTIsx/UZs31AlZrpm2tu9GuN1UNEudPFY9/7paK /iX+mDKXNIao4vpAWQpJjnPG43P/T9ge9h1DW+IKn1PWynucwtdc0hVbHMVYyTn/1qqt R7IoYzgIMODYlRp8d/2UBW//G005VBP7EJ3Flr+XyIg375h3fDDoX54POXPeb6Bf9GlS vLXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=0aJLnOB+2U9AQCKGJ2hiiqnCeefXpXts17esEHUfr3Y=; b=fZJ05PpolQA4jJB6f2pW7Mk8s6yUSYEPLtolgq5Tcvoxi8H6Z2Q5KPq/sVyzb8QNj7 nHTKTGAMaZStXgGGGCSnfclKv9m6xzYK6Gdp4jCYkm+SUBt5bxzIwOiDqpWghIQKJVU7 XUdytrCtJyFq5egy7251IamJRZWrUK4UQtavS0tJgazu1u99TUAt1lkeJN3kn/iLF3Tv TCDxZI0i9B2DHR1yW3rSZlHZIv93isaVGrlbV4KKR6240B/AjIBBmHpO0KlzrR0x/SHF uSTcMwEYNHf/OU1XOH78nT1vINRab15xGBCvE9Vx2Ai1YJCa7s3DBfMcwQeiiU4hIf+H WMhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jIAE5o/3x/mpI8WcUtcysb3A0ploAwTWXKS8288Ycba8bpSLi k5TV+QUFQ2+ng8f9w/cumbprvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVSfPIQHH2zx+WjSG1XvK0qjLdRZTF4k/B6knMtTDzvYxrHhYWyeN7PBsPxVBBn/ny5I3ZSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d48c:0:b0:35e:aa26:b720 with SMTP id o12-20020a4ad48c000000b0035eaa26b720mr12084569oos.12.1653444671894; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:381:4400:e80b:5162:a050:2e6e:1a01]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7-20020a9d0e87000000b00606a6c09a0csm5641889otj.12.2022.05.24.19.11.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 May 2022 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Wolf Noble In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 21:11:09 -0500 Message-Id: <2853D8F3-A64B-43A6-B923-306902AA9949@wolfspyre.com> References: To: Proxmox VE user list X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G5027e) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message MIME_QP_LONG_LINE 0.001 Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Experimenting with bond on a non-LACP switch... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 02:11:22 -0000 I was condensing several (i emit traffic on one interface but listen on all b= ond members) into =E2=80=98active-passive=E2=80=99 this:=20 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBonding does a better job explaining the different modes=E2=80=A6=20 hope that helps? =F0=9F=A4=A1 ( sorry for the confusion ) W [=3D The contents of this message have been written, read, processed, erased= , sorted, sniffed, compressed, rewritten, misspelled, overcompensated, lost,= found, and most importantly delivered entirely with recycled electrons =3D]= > On May 24, 2022, at 16:40, Marco Gaiarin wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFMandi! Laurent Dumont > In chel di` si favelave... >=20 >> There is this old thread with a similar discussion : >> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cluster-lacp.90668/ >=20 > Apart that i have other clusters where corosync run against LACP bonds > without roubles, i've a little simpler question: >=20 >>> If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding >>> interfaces, then you have to use active-passive mode on the bonding >>> interfaces, other modes are unsupported. >=20 > What is 'active-passive'?! Is the same of 'active-backup'? seems a > terminology inconsistency to me... >=20 > --=20 > Se non trovi nessuno vuol dire che siamo scappati alle sei-shell (bash, > tcsh,csh...) (Possi) >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >=20