From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pfrank@gmx.de>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74CD46A55B
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:48:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D15619409
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B1168193FC
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:28 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net;
 s=badeba3b8450; t=1614358042;
 bh=1qc0k7Kyw9MpyvSQCvXL3JdlxHdnFwdMVldT02QD4k8=;
 h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=B/lrv39o4tC6VGnaunUmXsNC86WINbg5dmPrr/5yVSUkbHE2V5gBT5KTBqpejEISb
 nyccPZSSf9hGw8OA2mj1gPdDPVJR8diI+QDXUoonrLOXZ2fAYETM391Hor6RDn0RB6
 pXIch59HpXebeW4xz7rfm0Ca4AWd0RwgxSARX1Y8=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from mail.localdomain ([37.209.56.94]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005
 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M59GA-1lGmCc0hHw-001Bab for
 <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:22 +0100
Received: from main.localnet (main.fritz.box [192.168.2.20])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB6B92B77F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Petric Frank <pfrank@gmx.de>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:21 +0100
Message-ID: <2414888.kdYZ1jHi8b@main>
In-Reply-To: <3323539.L4jQFfv3LO@main>
References: <3323539.L4jQFfv3LO@main>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:X6aESoXZWuIl+NhL3GexIuxoz5y+SAmI6Whb05iXsi74aTipFho
 bYG7NFFKPFwWpfqBZ3vRkXXWDUCQKjx+bHsybVA+tlvpYRXFaObdMZiZLK+VLZPmk4rNw3E
 pzkAxgeWikaEY6A5sMDEm5+448m7hCtPr6gtypXqWcENZkjnd1Twgx+Y9wW5gpiWxye4zSZ
 DBY7UuEoxOCi+Iqzy+JAg==
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:oz4JE1dayzM=:21wpUHCqAGMfrpdk633HJa
 gaGqmpMKAfoAu5SoeH+WewggRZFvB5EIDITzhwGXyksvswgtV+x3IfY8ArfysqFG98bqHf6Kg
 P7GF746VwOqbj9efogcdGOMnRdrKkVAJkVabUztKZOdLB/MAABLjrSgxEcDKXrrW0EAbsnjjJ
 0ZcYbvcKHS+wXUdVpyNNWsRuL62o4CUvjHnvmnxbSVjjvXckXEQ1AOh8PguS/eltZ2USKkyvd
 HQMAkJjjDKjT18IaQxe3800K1rSqhGk7/L+eN6JhuZNZ7ZAcGf+9fpUvcIoLWL3C95fhdV0sf
 zP+BmpNfrGOzZVpefd8iM9rIH7qsJF9kh8vIqDPgUyX0/pw+jobidiOYu8UXdVXNj1Y4tl418
 RQVB/9iIZMZ2uvqeb6Dm3u3ioU8f7T6sZk65TExmC/Mhi5OCScyxRD3rMhYsd0bDQDH80UtvK
 5eacE32Q+H3AuZPxLyft8BNQo0aKM6++zB7Jw+wQtYJtLBrb3DxMVPxrxmU8EPEIoA4n1FUr5
 n5jLfVZJ5sN3AYw+kGwyXcVBJRmKjtj8QEo5b3tN7M022XBIDO/MS/+eNWsWdYLlUaXFLcVRQ
 h9VPRqy/WI81xKmGh3FBnHR8/q2BU+s4SFgELT0hNA0/o6C2nGkYIABnTzOCcnG47sJlGDNHI
 WTMjvBRdts3aXcZufMRpebJxiZCoPD/nRghb57c6Cst8jNlUdNEp2o21QIYUn3FvNGSetSJqx
 hFoUyYcMdfUKxdjlBxq7Ci6UGCFY+nZTgawWP4vy2UmuRsVqfjjAGVStutM42uviP4YeO0yor
 PlTf5BruHliVJQ7Mv5g/zPVL9MbVLuhmB6d8U6V9lfXgZkCRXhBU7BvWBiRXQII57zYnglg6U
 /GTO+BAISCU3CONYf5ig==
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.281 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW        -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      -0.001 Average reputation (+2)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Backup job requires email
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:48:00 -0000

Hello,

followup - if the email parameter is not given to the vzdump command no ma=
il
is send. Also no error message about a missing parameter is issued.

So in in my opinion this is a bug of the web GUI. Do you agree ?

regards
  Petric

Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021, 17:50:16 CET schrieb Petric Frank:
> Hello,
>
> wanted to create an scheduled backup job via Datacenter -> Backup.
>
> In earlier versions on Proxmox you don't have to give a notification eMa=
il-
> address. But now you have to enter one in the field "Send email to:". Al=
so
> the field "Email notification" only gives the options "Always" or "On
> failure only", but not something like "None".
>
> Actually running Proxmox Virtual Environment 6.3-3
>
> Is this a bug in the web-gui ?
>
> Is there a command line tool to create the job ?
>
> Ok, i can create a cron entry ...
>
> kind regards
>   Petric
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user