From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74CD46A55B for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:48:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D15619409 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B1168193FC for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1614358042; bh=1qc0k7Kyw9MpyvSQCvXL3JdlxHdnFwdMVldT02QD4k8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=B/lrv39o4tC6VGnaunUmXsNC86WINbg5dmPrr/5yVSUkbHE2V5gBT5KTBqpejEISb nyccPZSSf9hGw8OA2mj1gPdDPVJR8diI+QDXUoonrLOXZ2fAYETM391Hor6RDn0RB6 pXIch59HpXebeW4xz7rfm0Ca4AWd0RwgxSARX1Y8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from mail.localdomain ([37.209.56.94]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M59GA-1lGmCc0hHw-001Bab for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:22 +0100 Received: from main.localnet (main.fritz.box [192.168.2.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB6B92B77F for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:23 +0100 (CET) From: Petric Frank To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:47:21 +0100 Message-ID: <2414888.kdYZ1jHi8b@main> In-Reply-To: <3323539.L4jQFfv3LO@main> References: <3323539.L4jQFfv3LO@main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:X6aESoXZWuIl+NhL3GexIuxoz5y+SAmI6Whb05iXsi74aTipFho bYG7NFFKPFwWpfqBZ3vRkXXWDUCQKjx+bHsybVA+tlvpYRXFaObdMZiZLK+VLZPmk4rNw3E pzkAxgeWikaEY6A5sMDEm5+448m7hCtPr6gtypXqWcENZkjnd1Twgx+Y9wW5gpiWxye4zSZ DBY7UuEoxOCi+Iqzy+JAg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:oz4JE1dayzM=:21wpUHCqAGMfrpdk633HJa gaGqmpMKAfoAu5SoeH+WewggRZFvB5EIDITzhwGXyksvswgtV+x3IfY8ArfysqFG98bqHf6Kg P7GF746VwOqbj9efogcdGOMnRdrKkVAJkVabUztKZOdLB/MAABLjrSgxEcDKXrrW0EAbsnjjJ 0ZcYbvcKHS+wXUdVpyNNWsRuL62o4CUvjHnvmnxbSVjjvXckXEQ1AOh8PguS/eltZ2USKkyvd HQMAkJjjDKjT18IaQxe3800K1rSqhGk7/L+eN6JhuZNZ7ZAcGf+9fpUvcIoLWL3C95fhdV0sf zP+BmpNfrGOzZVpefd8iM9rIH7qsJF9kh8vIqDPgUyX0/pw+jobidiOYu8UXdVXNj1Y4tl418 RQVB/9iIZMZ2uvqeb6Dm3u3ioU8f7T6sZk65TExmC/Mhi5OCScyxRD3rMhYsd0bDQDH80UtvK 5eacE32Q+H3AuZPxLyft8BNQo0aKM6++zB7Jw+wQtYJtLBrb3DxMVPxrxmU8EPEIoA4n1FUr5 n5jLfVZJ5sN3AYw+kGwyXcVBJRmKjtj8QEo5b3tN7M022XBIDO/MS/+eNWsWdYLlUaXFLcVRQ h9VPRqy/WI81xKmGh3FBnHR8/q2BU+s4SFgELT0hNA0/o6C2nGkYIABnTzOCcnG47sJlGDNHI WTMjvBRdts3aXcZufMRpebJxiZCoPD/nRghb57c6Cst8jNlUdNEp2o21QIYUn3FvNGSetSJqx hFoUyYcMdfUKxdjlBxq7Ci6UGCFY+nZTgawWP4vy2UmuRsVqfjjAGVStutM42uviP4YeO0yor PlTf5BruHliVJQ7Mv5g/zPVL9MbVLuhmB6d8U6V9lfXgZkCRXhBU7BvWBiRXQII57zYnglg6U /GTO+BAISCU3CONYf5ig== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.281 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Backup job requires email X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:48:00 -0000 Hello, followup - if the email parameter is not given to the vzdump command no ma= il is send. Also no error message about a missing parameter is issued. So in in my opinion this is a bug of the web GUI. Do you agree ? regards Petric Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021, 17:50:16 CET schrieb Petric Frank: > Hello, > > wanted to create an scheduled backup job via Datacenter -> Backup. > > In earlier versions on Proxmox you don't have to give a notification eMa= il- > address. But now you have to enter one in the field "Send email to:". Al= so > the field "Email notification" only gives the options "Always" or "On > failure only", but not something like "None". > > Actually running Proxmox Virtual Environment 6.3-3 > > Is this a bug in the web-gui ? > > Is there a command line tool to create the job ? > > Ok, i can create a cron entry ... > > kind regards > Petric > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user