From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF69604F9 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 68BBB2EA5A for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pmg.fws.fr (pmg.fws.fr [51.91.175.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7275C2EA4D for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pmg.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg.fws.fr (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4D3AAC29D2 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (zmproxy.fws.fr [10.29.1.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pmg.fws.fr (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 371E4C112C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6398B79BF for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150FF8B79C0 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmproxy.fws.fr 150FF8B79C0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=firewall-services.com; s=7DAD15A2-D84A-11E9-8F77-BEC4FAA34EBC; t=1602075333; bh=TQV6IqqnGKiaD3yiZ57fgdzxfFv/WF32wwsFWzZcJc0=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=EQ6JhblogRWH/sjWyNGkYT368OW7xqjAekaPk1pCW7AfJptb1xBfMDlVNHtDg5zL2 mDVyAGO6Eppm1WXTG1vZCMN7hIG9aes5dC9z3mUFB2pW6YBN/T6Zo8flkH45w5aJHR 49EAGxUkHcERoU63cwzgRgClJgzQc3rJdtVvX7q9Jqe/CQodoR9cyi9ixc9W4PDm1B y661MeTKnxngYs0X/gnGklEHnnp32FF1QJgLZ+LLGdI3SfqU8dgOp8233DZXGcKFt1 LvCQW6IS/H29lZXGVNSrojC/cXK9juVhRZUTp6BhdF5uoX3GqAE2ReXOe/YlQMqHVo xqC6i2cngGxxA== Received: from zmstore.fws.fr (zmstore.fws.fr [10.29.3.15]) by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1A78B79BF for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:55:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Daniel Berteaud To: Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <224342040.206886.1602075332946.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> In-Reply-To: <970746267.205741.1602057326034.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> References: <1550328837.203739.1601999955107.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> <497035042.203793.1602001437004.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> <970746267.205741.1602057326034.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.29.1.17] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3963 (ZimbraWebClient - GC85 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3963) Thread-Topic: QEMU failing to start from the web with ZFS Over iSCSI Thread-Index: YNcoNVj0xuPOHvdNIO68CrY5h48UW0qjZ1BX X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.016 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, fws.fr, firewall-services.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] QEMU failing to start from the web with ZFS Over iSCSI X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:56:06 -0000 ----- Le 7 Oct 20, =C3=A0 9:55, Daniel Berteaud daniel@firewall-services.co= m a =C3=A9crit : Looks like I'm not the only one with this issue. And it's not affecting onl= y ZFS over iSCSI. RAW iSCSI seems to be affected too, see https://forum.pro= xmox.com/threads/after-upgrading-from-5-x-to-6-x-iscsi-vms-can-only-be-star= ted-via-commandline.77090/ Regards, Daniel --=20 [ https://www.firewall-services.com/ ] =09 Daniel Berteaud=20 FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS, La s=C3=A9curit=C3=A9 des r=C3=A9seaux=20 Soci=C3=A9t=C3=A9 de Services en Logiciels Libres=20 T=C3=A9l : +33.5 56 64 15 32=20 Matrix: @dani:fws.fr=20 [ https://www.firewall-services.com/ | https://www.firewall-services.com ]