From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E5968DDB for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:46:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CD2BABB5A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:45:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.jostedal.no (smtp.jostedal.no [217.17.211.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 93C4DBB4D for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:45:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jostedal.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EDC54366 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:39:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.jostedal.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dpmx.servers.jostedal.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MENJdQsNytKR for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:39:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.234.0.29] (95.62-50-191.enivest.net [62.50.191.95]) (Authenticated sender: ronny@aasen.cx) by smtp.jostedal.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 625AA542D0 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:39:23 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: ronny+pve-user@aasen.cx To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <6f8b35b3-bd74-93f1-5298-eb9980c70d77@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <9d09aa69-95aa-0d96-e119-57b724f29080@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <1d7f5c19-790a-472c-9fcd-6f8d6b8d0f9c@dkfz-heidelberg.de> From: Ronny Aasen Message-ID: <21df9509-a8c7-9a47-ff5f-e166f9efa2eb@aasen.cx> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:39:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1d7f5c19-790a-472c-9fcd-6f8d6b8d0f9c@dkfz-heidelberg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.172 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [PVE-User] PBS WAS : Backup of one VM always fails X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:46:01 -0000 On 04.12.2020 15:20, Frank Thommen wrote: > Lot's of klicking to configure the other 30 VMs, but yes, that's > probably the most appropriate thing to do now :-)  I have to arrange for > a free NFS share first, though, as there is no free local disk space for > 3+ TB of backup... > > compleatly unrelated... but since you have several large machines, and multiple hours backup time. You should consider testing out proxmox backup server. It have worked flawlessly on our tests. small and speedy backups with dirty block tracking. while also keeping many historical copies via deduplication. easy restores. but they do take the time tho :) we copy from one proxmox using rbd backed vm's to another proxmox cluster using backup repo on cephfs kind regards Ronny