From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E29196ACE for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:36:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3D0281D7CE for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:36:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:36:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EA683481CD; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:36:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <203e9746-9dcb-4bff-9967-c6c76a8c303a@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:36:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>, uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com References: <mailman.318.1709233855.434.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> <0fe68fd5-1d64-428e-889b-c5ec6eb24860@gmail.com> <mailman.319.1709241604.434.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <mailman.319.1709241604.434.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.019 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] pve wiki docs wrong -- shared zfs via iscsi isn't possible X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:36:19 -0000 i think there is a misunderstanding here what zfs over iscsi actually does zfs over iscsi does not mean we put zfs on an iscsi exported volume, but rather the target exposed iscsi volumes that are created there via zfs we then control (via ssh) the creation/deletion/renaming of said zvols and use the set iscsi software (e.g. lio) to export them as iscsi luns that way pve can use those iscsi luns as volumes for vms, make snapshots (via ssh on zfs on the target) etc. with this in mind i think it's obvious why the storage is marked shared regards Dominik