From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2747AAA76
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:40:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1DA842AADC
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:40:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AA8B12AAD3
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:40:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
 id 5BA443CA5EF; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermione.lilliput.linux.it ([192.168.1.24]
 helo=hermione.sv.lnf.it) by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>)
 id 1njoNY-0008SL-0H; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:35:16 +0200
Received: by hermione.sv.lnf.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id DB014A003B9; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:35:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:35:15 +0200
From: Marco Gaiarin <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
To: nada <nada@verdnatura.es>
Cc: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20220427203515.GB72008@lilliput.linux.it>
References: <hjfgji-e552.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
 <7c154f7ca6db8be70a34468150cf7875@verdnatura.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7c154f7ca6db8be70a34468150cf7875@verdnatura.es>
Organization: Casa Gaiarin
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.189 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL           0.5 SPF set to ?all
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Disk performance test guidance...
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:40:13 -0000

Mandi! nada
  In chel di` si favelave...

> you have NFS at server B so the speed must be better @B
> but before disk performance test you may also test
> traffic e.g. by iperf or iperf3

Sure, i need also to test network, but fortunately i know decently
iperf, while i know little ZFS...

Thanks.