From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F0DAB9E
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 18:00:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 43CCA22E21
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 18:00:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 24D9822E15
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 18:00:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
 id 38F323CA45B; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 18:00:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermione.lilliput.linux.it ([192.168.1.24]
 helo=hermione.sv.lnf.it) by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>)
 id 1nblWX-0004pU-2p; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:55:17 +0200
Received: by hermione.sv.lnf.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id E4313A004F1; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 17:55:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:55:16 +0200
From: Marco Gaiarin <gaio@lilliput.linux.it>
To: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>, pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Message-ID: <20220405155516.GB13740@lilliput.linux.it>
References: <461hhi-f5n2.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
 <q5mqhi-sod.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
 <3c6d1ee7-991c-50af-7427-f152ccdbe869@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3c6d1ee7-991c-50af-7427-f152ccdbe869@proxmox.com>
Organization: Casa Gaiarin
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.181 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL           0.5 SPF set to ?all
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Replication failed, got tiemout?
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 16:00:50 -0000

Mandi! Aaron Lauterer
  In chel di` si favelave...

> Is the pool using HDDs?

Yes. After fiddling a bit, we are supposing an IO peak trouble, this
confirm all.

Because we don't need normally strict replication timing, for now we
have limited the bandwidth, and seems works.


Thanks for all the info.