From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D271976454 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:49:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C7AC923510 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:49:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.ngi.it (smtp1.ngi.it [IPv6:2001:4c91::112]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0CB7B23503 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:48:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tank.sv.lnf.it (88-147-114-200.static.eolo.it [88.147.114.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.ngi.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A00602B1 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:48:58 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: smtp1.ngi.it; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sv.lnf.it header.i=@sv.lnf.it header.b="BwmIX0CC"; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sv.lnf.it; s=2017; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6/Z7qSwvTk/Z+y6r2iJYz4ul6eVbzbAA0cZf/VX7ANc=; b=BwmIX0CCT5pxNQVkCDQRRbm4dN +wUWB4+mnPtvalDmwpe6nZLNl0950NkNzfMpc5LLnhzHMxeSaZua4U9TasQwwRV94dP/03//QK83E DZxL/JYKygnTRODlAMMJ4qeD255TykQE4N1voKYz5ChOTG6KfcElkydiEuDRwqFoB8+Q=; Received: from [10.5.1.3] (helo=vdmsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it) by tank.sv.lnf.it with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1m40nR-0007Pc-TK for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:48:57 +0200 Received: from [10.5.1.44] (helo=hermione.sv.lnf.it) by vdmsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1m40nR-0006sR-4q for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:48:57 +0200 Received: by hermione.sv.lnf.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07053A0010F; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:48:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:48:56 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Message-ID: <20210715124856.GC3399@sv.lnf.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 'Organization: Associazione La Nostra Famiglia - Polo FVG' 'From: Marco Gaiarin ' X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.654 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record T_SPF_PERMERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror) URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [lanostrafamiglia.it, lnf.it] Subject: [PVE-User] 'asymmetrix storage' and migration... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:49:00 -0000 I'm a bit puzzled. A little 'ZFS' cluster, with two asymmetrical nodes; second node is there only, just in case, to run some little VMs (PBX, firewall, ...). First node have a second RAIDZ volume called 'rpool-data', that does not exist on second node; eg, storage.conf is: dir: local path /var/lib/vz content iso,vztmpl,backup zfspool: local-zfs pool rpool/data content images,rootdir sparse 1 zfspool: rpool-data pool rpool-data content images,rootdir mountpoint /rpool-data sparse 1 Clearly on node 2 'rpool-data' have a question mark. I've tried to migrate a VMs from node 2 to 1 that have disks only on 'local-zfs': root@brpve1:~# grep ^scsi /etc/pve/nodes/brpve2/qemu-server/100.conf scsi0: local-zfs:vm-100-disk-0,size=100G scsi1: local-zfs:vm-100-disk-1,backup=0,size=1000G scsi2: local-zfs:vm-100-disk-2,backup=0,size=500G scsihw: virtio-scsi-pci but i get: 2021-07-15 14:14:54 starting migration of VM 100 to node 'brpve1' (10.15.5.21) zfs error: cannot open 'rpool-data': no such pool zfs error: cannot open 'rpool-data': no such pool 2021-07-15 14:14:54 ERROR: Problem found while scanning volumes - could not activate storage 'rpool-data', zfs error: cannot import 'rpool-data': no such pool available 2021-07-15 14:14:54 aborting phase 1 - cleanup resources 2021-07-15 14:14:54 ERROR: migration aborted (duration 00:00:00): Problem found while scanning volumes - could not activate storage 'rpool-data', zfs error: cannot import 'rpool-data': no such pool available TASK ERROR: migration aborted Because in 'rpool-data' currently we have no data, i've simply disabled storage 'rpool-data', migrate the machine and then re-enabled back. Why migration does not work, even if there's no disks in 'rpool-data'? Thre's some way to 'fake' an 'rpool-data' on the second node, only to have PVE not to complain? Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797 Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA! http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000 (cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)