From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0155571752 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E0C6BB537 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:28:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 69E4DB528 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:28:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B2381444A8; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:23:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:23:17 +0200 From: Stoiko Ivanov To: Mark Schouten Cc: Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <20210629102317.0a29b58f@rosa.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <0d129a03-9a70-e123-5e5a-e7862ef303ac@tuxis.nl> References: <5377d815-bde4-9ca8-8584-ff63a6eb27ba@proxmox.com> <0d129a03-9a70-e123-5e5a-e7862ef303ac@tuxis.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.581 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 7.0 (beta) released! X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 08:29:12 -0000 Hi, On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:05:44 +0200 Mark Schouten wrote: > Hi, > > Op 24-06-2021 om 15:16 schreef Martin Maurer: > > We are pleased to announce the first beta release of Proxmox Virtual > > Environment 7.0! The 7.x family is based on the great Debian 11 > > "Bullseye" and comes with a 5.11 kernel, QEMU 6.0, LXC 4.0, OpenZFS 2.0.4. > > I just upgraded a node in our demo cluster and all seemed fine. Except > for non-working cluster network. I was unable to ping the node through > the cluster interface, pvecm saw no other nodes and ceph was broken. Thanks for the report - could you provide some details on the upgraded node? Mostly which NICs are used - but also the complete hardware -setup (If you prefer you can send me a pvereport to my e-mail) > > However, if I ran tcpdump, ping started working, but not the rest. quite odd - last time I ran into something like this was with an OpenBSD router, where the promisc flag did not get passed down to the physical port of a bridge) the output of `ip -details a` and `ip -details l` might provide some insight > > Interesting situation, which I 'fixed' by disabling vlan-aware-bridge > for that interface. After the reboot, everything works (AFAICS). Thanks for sharing the mitigation (sadly this won't work for everybody) > > If Proxmox wants to debug this, feel free to reach out to me, I can > grant you access to this node so you can check it out. > Kind Regards, stoiko