From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23267697A9 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:41:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10C4F29928 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:41:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1F8B02991B for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:40:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B0B73462F0; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:40:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:40:53 +0100 From: Stoiko Ivanov To: Uwe Sauter Cc: Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <20210224124053.6a2216b7@rosa.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <806e6159-3ca1-530a-ff98-99ac4a4ced05@gmail.com> References: <20210224111140.0af49108@rosa.proxmox.com> <806e6159-3ca1-530a-ff98-99ac4a4ced05@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.062 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [hs-esslingen.de, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] =?utf-8?q?Update_to_ZFS_2_available_=E2=80=93_breaks_?= =?utf-8?q?dependencies?= X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:41:30 -0000 On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:50:03 +0100 Uwe Sauter wrote: > Am 24.02.21 um 11:11 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:56:49 +0100 > > Uwe Sauter wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> since yesterday, 2021-02-23, updates for ZFS 2.0.3 are available. > >> Currently my systems have 0.8.5 installed. When trying to update using aptitude I get a popup reading: > >> > >> ################### > >> Some packages were broken and have been fixed: > >> > >> Keep the following packages at their current version: > >> libnvpair2linux [Not Installed] > >> libuutil2linux [Not Installed] > >> libzfs3linux [Not Installed] > >> libzpool3linux [Not Installed] > >> zfs-initramfs [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)] > >> zfs-zed [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)] > >> zfsutils-linux [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)] > >> ################### > > With ZFS 2.0.0 most shipped libraries got bumped to new major versions > > (and new package names) > > e.g. > > libnvpair1linux -> libnvpair2linux > > > > usually this gets resolved correctly (and worked here on many systems) > > by running `apt full-upgrade` (instead of `apt upgrade`) > > > > It has been a while since I worked with `aptitude` - but did you > > run `aptitude full-upgrade`? > > > > else - does it work if you upgrade using `apt full-upgrade`? > > ################################ > > # apt update > Hit:1 http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian buster InRelease > Hit:2 http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian buster-updates InRelease > Hit:3 http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian-security buster/updates InRelease > Hit:4 http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/debian buster-backports InRelease > Hit:5 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/ceph-octopus buster InRelease > Hit:6 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve buster InRelease > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > 15 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. > > # aptitude full-upgrade > The following NEW packages will be installed: > libnvpair2linux{ab} libuutil2linux{ab} libzfs3linux{ab} libzpool3linux{ab} > pve-headers-5.4.98-1-pve{a} > pve-kernel-5.4.98-1-pve{a} > The following packages will be REMOVED: > pve-headers-5.4.78-2-pve{u} > The following packages will be upgraded: > libproxmox-backup-qemu0 libpve-common-perl libpve-guest-common-perl libpve-storage-perl > pve-container pve-firmware > pve-headers-5.4 pve-kernel-5.4 pve-kernel-helper pve-manager pve-qemu-kvm spl zfs-initramfs > zfs-zed zfsutils-linux > 15 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 0 B/159 MB of archives. After unpacking 296 MB will be used. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libzfs3linux : Breaks: libzfs2linux but 0.8.5-pve1 is installed > libzpool3linux : Breaks: libzpool2linux but 0.8.5-pve1 is installed > libnvpair2linux : Breaks: libnvpair1linux but 0.8.5-pve1 is installed > libuutil2linux : Breaks: libuutil1linux but 0.8.5-pve1 is installed > The following actions will resolve these dependencies: > > Keep the following packages at their current version: > 1) libnvpair2linux [Not Installed] > 2) libuutil2linux [Not Installed] > 3) libzfs3linux [Not Installed] > 4) libzpool3linux [Not Installed] > 5) zfs-initramfs [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)] > 6) zfs-zed [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)] > 7) zfsutils-linux [0.8.5-pve1 (now, stable)] > > > > Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q > Abandoning all efforts to resolve these dependencies. > Abort. > > ################################ > > Looks like I'm not getting the same updates as you do. I'll wait a few days and check back. could you try with `apt` instead of `aptitude` I just tried - and get the same issues when running aptitude (which uses a different resolver for conflicts) - apt is working fine though :) Alternatively you should also be able to upgrade by cycling a few times through aptitudes suggestions. > > Thanks, > > Uwe > > > I hope this helps! > > Regards, > > stoiko > > > > > >> > >> Could someone advice (possible from Proxmox team) advice on how to apply the updates in this > >> particular situation? > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> pve-user mailing list > >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >> > >> > > > > > >