From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D7866D2D
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:36:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 084CD151C6
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:36:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5A7DD151BB
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:36:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 26C8943FF3;
 Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:36:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:36:48 +0100
From: Dominic =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4ger?= <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20210111073648.GA29825@mala>
References: <51f40ab8b46dac203ce907c46318645f@konsec.com>
 <927b14bed1ae378ee740fe7b4eb75cbecaa80811.camel@odiso.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <927b14bed1ae378ee740fe7b4eb75cbecaa80811.camel@odiso.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.681 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Single BPS for multiple PVE lead to namespace
 conflict
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:36:51 -0000

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:20:40AM +0100, aderumier@odiso.com wrote:
> I think it's on the roadmap.

You are right!
> Backup to one (physical) datastore from multiple Proxmox VE clusters, avoiding backup naming conflicts

https://pbs.proxmox.com/wiki/index.php/Roadmap