From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021FC690A4 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:24:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F2FA9C7A3 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:24:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 50DA7C78F for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:24:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0D72C41FB1; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:24:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:24:13 +0100 From: Dominic =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4ger?= To: Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <20201112092413.GA1174479@mala.proxmox.com> References: <1573062207.1043.1605023362305@webmail.proxmox.com> <20201112085452.nz56wdqddt4qirio@shell.tuxis.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201112085452.nz56wdqddt4qirio@shell.tuxis.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.718 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] qm cli X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:24:15 -0000 On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:54:52AM +0100, Mark Schouten wrote: > I for one would really love to use qm on a cluster base, instead of > nodes. I currently first need to find out which node a VM runs on, then > log on to that node, and then run the qm commands. For qm, yes. For pvesh, no. Instead of the initially mentioned command > for i in {123..128}; do qm snapshot $i ready ; done just do something like > for i in 100 101; do pvesh create nodes/dev/qemu/$i/snapshot --snapname ready; done where you replace dev with a node name of your choice. This API path is documented in [0]. qm snapshot is actually one of those commands that is mapped pretty directly to the API [1]. [0] https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/api-viewer/index.html#/nodes/{node}/qemu/{vmid}/snapshot [1] https://git.proxmox.com/?p=qemu-server.git;a=blob;f=PVE/CLI/qm.pm;h=b3b9251c0ad17598beafc8763b082c6e8ab1e95b;hb=HEAD#l931