From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C4768F34 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:55:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 09CA9BE78 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:55:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from icewarp.tuxis.nl (icewarp.tuxis.net [IPv6:2a03:7900:2:0:31:3:104:151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 421A3BE65 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:54:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; t=1605171293; x=1605776093; s=icewarp; d=tuxis.nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; v=1; bh=7zLI/aqIRqq+JRofyq26CKu+8BdQG8r1awoGcknu7oA=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References; b=oA34sV3x6YV9P52R7rxAMltyJQb8UY7raVD3faOimDfjuTq1yu8NasWpQSm+/nRh1b28Gv+S3jfaJJhEXG8VV4HS6zeLVbBqZ6/1QccnrP8RO8F8GEwbjN9LhjjqGr824FXFDEP2mWjYxpoXCu6rkzcc6X3PPLu38wMck60U0gm3OTC2AjTEf8cIWrMAw2gh9Gyi6ckQOaW3qM4/obiXKEAgebH9sR5DnUMBbzage+JgkvbQNz2FaWTaubLY7EXcuQAyFh9jNdbXrWO1WFKfFFuxW+B1/1CDGBTqLue6fToFubpKr6cOp7f6LPzHPRLLWl6pijrMp1CSemS+DeJ2Ng== Received: from shell.tuxis.net ([2a03:7900:2:0:31:3:104:134]) by icewarp.tuxis.nl (12.1.1 build 4 DEB9 x64) with SMTP (SSL) id 202011120954520151; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:54:52 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 2566 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:54:52 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:54:52 +0100 From: Mark Schouten To: Proxmox VE user list Cc: Alejandro Bonilla , "pve-user@pve.proxmox.com" Message-ID: <20201112085452.nz56wdqddt4qirio@shell.tuxis.net> References: <1573062207.1043.1605023362305@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1573062207.1043.1605023362305@webmail.proxmox.com> X-Ripe-Handle: MS8714-RIPE User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A782F27.5FACF85C.0067,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.146 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [tuxis.nl] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] qm cli X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:55:00 -0000 On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > Whenever I run commands from within one of the nodes, they appear to be targeted to the local system only. > > Yes, this is how it works. I for one would really love to use qm on a cluster base, instead of nodes. I currently first need to find out which node a VM runs on, then log on to that node, and then run the qm commands. Is it usefull to create a feature-request for this in Bugzilla? -- Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V. KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/ T: +31 318 200208 | info@tuxis.nl