From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA376698E for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:30:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 90FC2245FF for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:30:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.ngi.it (smtp1.ngi.it [IPv6:2001:4c91::112]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C9A5D245F3 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:30:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from tank.sv.lnf.it (unknown [88.147.114.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.ngi.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AC4608EC for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:30:05 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: smtp1.ngi.it; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sv.lnf.it header.i=@sv.lnf.it header.b="qBpRLgW0"; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sv.lnf.it; s=2017; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9x7GD1a2SzHYTa2e1RBWurSHRahpxxsptdhnjzOOI6o=; b=qBpRLgW0TEa/0LEhppExT8ZBqe cUb45Cazz5OUsjgnl88qLFcxLZOxmWPfoZGlEOODHvAxcpn4Lk9l9OwuhMpDUyKtD+nRZLErYiqFx C9RX1Fbq7q46ktVScERnT7aVmcKJJCBLq4nWZWfAsZ7ZlmTq30cgg4+GMoigfjzxpzFM=; Received: from [10.5.1.3] (helo=vdmsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it) by tank.sv.lnf.it with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1kb4cm-00063x-Qm for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:30:04 +0100 Received: from [10.5.1.44] (helo=hermione.sv.lnf.it) by vdmsv1.ad.fvg.lnf.it with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1kb4cl-0007Yb-UB for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:30:03 +0100 Received: by hermione.sv.lnf.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C23FCA0012A; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:30:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:30:03 +0100 From: Marco Gaiarin To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Message-ID: <20201106163003.GN4137@sv.lnf.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 'Organization: Associazione La Nostra Famiglia - Polo FVG' 'From: Marco Gaiarin ' User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.193 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record T_SPF_PERMERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror) URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [lanostrafamiglia.it, bufferbloat.net, lnf.it] Subject: [PVE-User] Network hardware tuning and bond... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 16:30:13 -0000 [Probably it is all but a specific PVE question, but...] I need to setup a PVE standalone node that have to host some VMs, one of that have to be a 'firewall'; one or more NICs are dedicated to WAN link. Following the 'bufferbloat' recommendation: https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Tests_for_Bufferbloat/ i've added to a typical bridge: iface enp2s0f1 inet manual ethernet-autoneg on link-speed 100 link-duplex full hardware-dma-ring-tx 18 offload-tso off offload-gso off offload-gro off auto vmbr1 iface vmbr1 inet static address 172.17.44.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 172.17.44.1 bridge_ports enp2s0f1 bridge_waitport 30 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 and seems to work, eg link speed is 100Mbit/s and offload parameters are off. But i've tried to do the same thing with an LACP bond, adding this parameters both to single interfaces and also on the bond interface, but seems get ignored. It is not possible to set hardware parameters in bond and/or in bond members?! Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797 Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA! http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000 (cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)