From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B48B66599 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:24:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 503E415133 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:24:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from icewarp.tuxis.nl (icewarp.tuxis.net [IPv6:2a03:7900:2:0:31:3:104:151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4987115128 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:24:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; t=1595755475; x=1596360275; s=icewarp; d=tuxis.nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; v=1; bh=fk6tD4tfy45ewMDh53Fkesi/hZklDXIiDVoeB05iac0=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References; b=8V89aV+i4UfBOuYie4Q3Yg3XSMbfTtybwUXDv+2MaWOC5W7WZJNPMeeGZ3O8IknGnhqn2t51gKVJ0kAM5y3IsjrB5HBsqnN6TxYv/Cm96hnjAn+TpiWKsqyIoE/GubBnNjEKWKP88eWN5gF2zKGZwz5NXfG03KubgTRGtoFT+byV6v5ZB5HY1hlJQthOUXWMULR5iecRYPQuppIm5jIdYEjZtauIQLJ0kt4slZg0ahC5dqo0MGXmUGVt+2zFi89Qdz4H0pKAyhQbD0uHQhASUY9jUx2oo6IS6cNBDr6u2uE/Puctc7QJUdu2Bt5leisXlHlbK2TENbQySGuphNuoSA== Received: from shell.tuxis.net ([2a03:7900:2:0:31:3:104:134]) by icewarp.tuxis.nl (12.1.1 build 4 DEB9 x64) with SMTP (SSL) id 202007261124346902; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:24:34 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 31725 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:24:34 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:24:34 +0200 From: Mark Schouten To: ronny+pve-user@aasen.cx, Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <20200726092434.agdjhigt4qr4vkk6@shell.tuxis.net> References: <1110267368.76036.1595436034847.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> <1595486387.pi9zv7y79a.astroid@nora.none> <141180690.77175.1595487181182.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> <945247964.82475.1595574150577.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Ripe-Handle: MS8714-RIPE User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A782F22.5F1D4BD2.0042,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.273 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.158 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PBS : is dirty-bitmap really accurate ? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:24:42 -0000 On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:54:13AM +0200, Ronny Aasen wrote: > would mounting the disk with discard help on this ? where it only trims > blocks that are actually discarded ? instead of touching the whole disk with > fstrim ? I would expect so, yes. -- Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V. KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/ T: +31 318 200208 | info@tuxis.nl