From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F69365572 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:23:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3ECC62657D for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:23:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ssl1.xaq.nl (ssl1.xaq.nl [IPv6:2001:985:6a0f:64::24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7306E2656F for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:23:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from x2go.xaq.nl (x2go.utr.xaq.nl [192.168.64.48]) by ssl1.xaq.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF01E7F6B1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:22:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:22:53 +0200 From: richard lucassen To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Message-Id: <20200723102253.b991fc7e31f4e92f54a87500@lucassen.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1506136562.36294.1595313175981.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> <20200721104154.0f2188d06a622942fddb7cab@lucassen.org> Reply-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Organization: XAQ Systems X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.851 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_NONE 0.25 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.703 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.972 SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem with Centos 5.X virtio ethernet drivers and last PVE updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:23:31 -0000 On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:06:27 +0200 Michael Rasmussen via pve-user wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:41:54 +0200 > richard lucassen wrote: > > > network. There is definitly something wrong somewhere. > > > The only thing wrong here is that you a running a version of > RHEL/CentOS which is in maintenance support 2. This means there will > be no more updates except critical bugs. As of March 31, 2017 it is > considered in deep freeze! I know. But sometimes you need to keep an old version and a good way to handle this is to run such an old version in a virtual environment. A vhost supplies virtual hardware and apparently this virtual hardware has changed. This is not A Good Thing IMHO. It runs well under subversion 27 of the pve kernel but has stopped under version 30. So I think this is a bug as I do not expect design changes between subversion 27 and 30. R. -- richard lucassen https://contact.xaq.nl/