From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3260A605F1 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:05:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 074984A10 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:04:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from styx18.konzept-is.de (styx18.konzept-is.de [212.62.202.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0C9ED4A01 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:04:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.10] (unknown [10.10.10.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: storm) by styx18.konzept-is.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78B8F1FF25 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:59:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20080b37-49dd-cc91-ceea-874f860c22db@konzept-is.de> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:59:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <20220110141350.716d9727@schleppmd.hlrs.de> From: Ralf Storm In-Reply-To: <20220110141350.716d9727@schleppmd.hlrs.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.470 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and ZFS on large JBOD ? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:05:21 -0000 Hello Martin, should be no problem and you can configure wait-time at startup for ZFS to avoid timeouts, this is also described in the proxmox doku in the ZFS chapter. The doku for proxmox is very good, keep on it and you will be happy. best regards Ralf Am 10/01/2022 um 14:13 schrieb Martin Dziobek: > Hi pve-users ! > > Does anybody has experiences if proxmox works > flawlessly to manage a large zfs volume consisting > of a SAS-connected JBOD of 60 * 1TB-HDDs ? > > Right now, management is done with a regular > Debian 11 installation, and rebooting the thing > always ends up in a timeout mess at network startup, > because it takes ages to enumerate all those member disks, > import the zpool and export it via NFS. > > I am considering to install Proxmox on this server for the > sole purpose of smooth startup and management operation. > Might that be a stable solution ? > > Best regards, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > -- Ralf Storm Systemadministrator