From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0099E95137
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:55:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D28BC66DC
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:55:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:55:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1D04C48BA9
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:55:49 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1adf4605-0f08-ac83-b25a-6819a8f6e286@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 12:55:48 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.8.0
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <CACzVk9XVEURi_uTo6U0GHKUzZ4XHfK16Az7oxcdRkMLnL1orkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <8d1679b2-c28f-b1be-19f4-9d863a5fe761@konzept-is.de>
 <rk0vcj-aho1.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <rk0vcj-aho1.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.320 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.092 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] vmbr0: received packet on bond0 with own address as
 source address
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:55:50 -0000

Make sure to check the mode of the bond with `ip link`.

We've seen these previously when the configured mode could not be set 
for some reason and it defaulted to `balance-rr`.