From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81268022E for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:28:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 834581EDB4 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:27:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B8D8C1EDAA for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:27:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1637134041; bh=I/rHNixCicsJvO8ZLuh7shssA3SMUkzKRhD/VG92N/w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To; b=WwMGWxuOAI6WstMqrgLTe782dW+F00iNJ9TygDCeaMahKlzGtVqmbZIyKaJ/Wf60q jwJI96Bo9gqT/APFltNTs4YyA1ly7KOUGxbhEpk6VYw1yKGqK3myfBl6zn+JDUlHnF Vj6MZn/e1nhLIH0eGplNPf1SM0eazfFZbqhDfb1Q= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from smtpclient.apple ([93.133.29.140]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mm9Zc-1mMfsR1bbU-00iKn9 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:22:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Roland privat Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:22:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1D371F61-AA60-483E-BFC3-B68179844482@web.de> References: <000001d7db4f$cde671d0$69b35570$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <000001d7db4f$cde671d0$69b35570$@gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18G82) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:TTU7zVgRHBE0MdDpn7WyCy9WmYGs3WDknS0oi9lzXSSpcOO7BOr 8JXp8h9chKhNurw8XkstLGrSixJNipr5t8QXmorTlsZwbFynXB1f1JkvS3v+RlEc7y6kY7Q u6f0Uk4Gk3rPetvhhv+VssGxt7ao2ik7gtZHuj8iqBj/DPedVOeKESLlYb9eS5GeD3fcL4R fdsDO1z7HxkZ9uPXDo/Jg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:zVUtzpL+GfI=:V3n6IkHkTW9Q5eS3XTbYZe XXw+coTSNi/vyFdmh5YdePVOhir5pYeKIxZdw/Hxh1adB69gIVl2uy6baRYjJ+gsyH3Ha9sRp z+GS7C+Ls0JLOAqKJ/8he093FnvrguKpPWzc1cN6tQ29P0rIIchaptPYn9JQmWy0jCWTUeE8z gETonhGEZReiB0g1HJ73+zsm1nwZTAy4dQNKhvWZbhKM7Sp2h7QGu/nz6KXe8/anpo2UU0EOp 1PLqvOBbrdOBnkUZCBdcunWMYTqiQq56itvApCcRE46r55rx0IsPOcNs1e6lsLiuwcp3DEFkd MhEZSEZDfa1LWZNSgm973NWmq7cxtR2g3ObfR4m9f+ugbgyeWVXUUVyKze6D7l/atkZbY3YFV liRQLExIz6bMorDUxiLULEQe1J2YfEeEulNIeHmaUMja3YzG+yB/iIbAMzXqElBdipL6RB32H AjwSn+Z1rQwAv1NJrbzh9GCFBIjLapOWveY8dBIm+6XgwI/38DrJzvhGU4KC0bzawJJdwIBjG /pOWxlGIInp/c8o6CmFNZqapeHFzzAxXHsHCUqHgx4PQ2adptQtIkV2AN923KN5005a+YXmNg i/plbeBpCUnaDSx5yBhaaDzeLoY1HVeQwULCL5vkOPifd0iQQgnavGEGCl2kP8OhWsJh206Gi WOxbwE/EX+BzvFFMx35v1h5NXRn31ckLjeEbU8YESsMqMWZPswlZH0zNJ8AAcOS3Q4xY9FZMR YASPtgK25McbTrRFzLQsSPH+eA3zM+U91HUTmEZgxRTp70srrBS7BOQ5IpqQ9IBXxiJ2hR6ex A2n6wbu7shzPS/DF4pH70Dc0GYAq8SaefyRmXUCkmFrIQ3QKSdq4m0qaMrL8jLCytpRRmCqHz k8A2QaNp5fHfVpXQZfCFHXR6A0tbd4wlWizHTjbiQxBHmEBq4ECugnSoa1IkgG5hUhisL4oGf 0T1u/1y/Y6lfrm07jEnMayoW2QL5OI7L+fqxk+aAilVoLiHGCo+m2aGf8jmtasQy0fHaQejrP 2uM60gVf1uyaxP2r5jI1e21ZhZHfGZCsKIqv6f/lNMHvrQ86rAjwt8ygr00PhKxB2Y8MQvb4U OF55LAXGh8Ft2g= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Removing Node from Cluster A and adding to Cluster B X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:28:02 -0000 i=E2=80=98m curious which issues can arise and whats so difficult in removin= g and re-joining. i would find it useful to to migrate hosts between cluster, ad for now the= re is no easy or quick method to migrate virtual machines between clusters. roland Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 17.11.2021 um 02:10 schrieb JR Richardson : >=20 > =EF=BB=BFDate: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:37 +0100 > From: Eneko Lacunza > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Removing Node from Cluster A and adding to > Cluster B > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8; format=3Dflowed >=20 > Hi JR, >=20 > El 16/11/21 a las 4:25, JR Richardson escribi?: >> Quick question I hope, I have two productions cluster running PVE6 and=20= >> working fine, 13 node in one, 4 in another. Bother clusters have=20 >> separate switch VLANs and IP space so they are logically isolated. I=20 >> have a need to shift a couple of nodes from my larger cluster to my > smaller cluster. >>=20 >> My question is after I remove the nodes from one cluster, I'm reading=20 >> best practice is to re-install PVE from scratch before adding back to=20 >> the cluster. But this is to add it back to the same cluster or is this=20= >> best practice regardless of adding to new cluster as well? >=20 > As I understand it, reinstall is recommended for both cases. I don't think= > trying otherwise is worth it, multiple issues can arise. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Eneko Lacunza > Zuzendari teknikoa | Director t?cnico > Binovo IT Human Project >=20 > Hi Eneko, >=20 > Appreciate the feedback, that is precisely what I did and didn't have any > issues. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > JR >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >=20