From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A3DACA9 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:16:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 221246DF7 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:16:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:16:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B986C44FFA; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:16:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:15:54 +0100 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com, uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com References: <684a30c0-462f-6a74-0d26-1fcae814b9d5@gmail.com> <1669111204.2isxc986qz.astroid@yuna.none> <6c0e3f72-e303-a5ce-2c31-3aa0550d76a8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6c0e3f72-e303-a5ce-2c31-3aa0550d76a8@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.16.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1669112010.pbgzs6rswu.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.136 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ceph-volume binary missing in Quincy ceph-osd package X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:16:03 -0000 On November 22, 2022 11:03 am, Uwe Sauter wrote: > Am 22.11.22 um 11:00 schrieb Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler: >> On November 22, 2022 10:52 am, Uwe Sauter wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> looks like that ceph-volume is missing in the current Quincy ceph-osd p= ackage. >>=20 >> it got its own package now: ceph-volume >>=20 >> but it seems that is only recommended by ceph-osd, so depending on apt s= ettings >> it gets pulled in or not.. >>=20 >=20 > Hi Fabian, >=20 > looks like the package metadata is wrong then as apt-file still thinks th= at it belongs to ceph-osd. > And "pveceph install" didn't pull it in either. well, it's simply incomplete. apt-file relies on separate, optional metadat= a (Contents indices) that PVE repos don't have. so you get the result based o= n the ceph-osd package from the main Debian repo ;) >=20 > I'll install the package manually. yes, that works. I'll double check whether there is some check missing (for= new `pveceph install` calls, the package is added to the set of packages to be installed if quincy is selected) or if we can adapt some other dependency t= o get it pulled in on upgrades.