From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05FBD76429 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:56:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ED6822363A for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:56:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D4D422362D for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:56:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ABB3241C9F for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:56:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:56:50 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox VE user list References: <20210715124856.GC3399@sv.lnf.it> In-Reply-To: <20210715124856.GC3399@sv.lnf.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1626353683.posa6ve2a8.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.350 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 'asymmetrix storage' and migration... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:56:58 -0000 On July 15, 2021 2:48 pm, Marco Gaiarin wrote: >=20 > I'm a bit puzzled. >=20 >=20 > A little 'ZFS' cluster, with two asymmetrical nodes; second node is > there only, just in case, to run some little VMs (PBX, firewall, ...). >=20 > First node have a second RAIDZ volume called 'rpool-data', that does > not exist on second node; eg, storage.conf is: >=20 > dir: local > path /var/lib/vz > content iso,vztmpl,backup >=20 > zfspool: local-zfs > pool rpool/data > content images,rootdir > sparse 1 >=20 > zfspool: rpool-data > pool rpool-data > content images,rootdir > mountpoint /rpool-data > sparse 1 >=20 > Clearly on node 2 'rpool-data' have a question mark. yes, because you didn't tell PVE that this storage is only available on=20 node 1 > [...] > Why migration does not work, even if there's no disks in 'rpool-data'? because PVE can't know that this storage is not supposed to be checked=20 if you don't tell it ;) > Thre's some way to 'fake' an 'rpool-data' on the second node, only to > have PVE not to complain? you just need to set the list of nodes where the storage 'rpool-data'=20 exists in storage.cfg (via the GUI/API/pvesm).