From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4242B6B658 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:27:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 360C2160BC for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:26:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C2BDD160B2 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:26:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8BAA74627E; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:26:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:26:35 +0100 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com, storm References: <1612772213.gdeednkn6n.astroid@nora.none> <1612779647.88nw1czupf.astroid@nora.none> <319abf74-8e57-666e-31df-fe1c1d8a8db8@konzept-is.de> <1612783750.os88l87hm3.astroid@nora.none> <1935400026.3127.1613638223121@webmail.proxmox.com> <630c3278-3174-1460-ea1e-5fe9853210d0@konzept-is.de> <18439dd6-b2bc-de05-6701-30fe39ffdf10@konzept-is.de> In-Reply-To: <18439dd6-b2bc-de05-6701-30fe39ffdf10@konzept-is.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1613719500.vv82bs2knx.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.027 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Backup Failing sporadically due to "PBS backups are not supported by the running QEMU version" X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:27:12 -0000 On February 19, 2021 7:20 am, storm wrote: > so the last backup during last night failed again with the same error on=20 > the same node with pve-qemu-kvm 5.1.0-8 on which the backup was working=20 > yesterday >=20 > any ideas? just to confirm, can you do the following right after a backup fails,=20 and then again after you got the VM back into a working state? 123=20 should be replaced with the correct VMID.. perl -e 'use strict; use warnings; use PVE::QemuServer::Monitor; use Data::= Dumper; $Data::Dumper::Sortkeys=3D1; print Dumper(PVE::QemuServer::Monitor:= :qmp_cmd(123, { "execute" =3D> "query-proxmox-support" })), "\n";' it issues exactly the QMP command that queries the running VM for=20 proxmox-related features. it should return right away with output like=20 this: $VAR1 =3D { 'pbs-dirty-bitmap' =3D> bless( do{\(my $o =3D 1)}, 'JSON::PP::Boo= lean' ), 'pbs-dirty-bitmap-migration' =3D> $VAR1->{'pbs-dirty-bitmap'}, 'pbs-library-version' =3D> '1.0.2 (0723f448fdad1fcf84ec7ae7d702ba= ba11cb06d1)', 'query-bitmap-info' =3D> $VAR1->{'pbs-dirty-bitmap'} }; (the commit hash will be different) or with some error message. =