From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A2CC718E0 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6DA44E616 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from icewarp.tuxis.nl (icewarp.tuxis.net [IPv6:2a03:7900:2:0:31:3:104:151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DC146E608 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:04:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; t=1624968246; x=1625573046; s=icewarp; d=tuxis.nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; v=1; bh=RGshnYCnmSv2BsF088atYto8K2/LHuwVRKaZH3pAr38=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; b=NHLo+VCHYpF91migw52zFsfElAwN+SIbAfphMnouP4OOzgKgsvtTeNiZDUnoFdb9WfVkfQlc9LDHueWzIlk0FHqTaJ+NB8s7xPLXhr3F42fCpABsq71pCns5i3zLVyjG8L2gKX7t/QTjJ/mhEeAwG3BRN0Q1LnajWPHcRvMIybVItwdmD7rjDc8eO2CkAS3gBuzFYbDGqYaKHhWD0uBhrkaZN3D+UPJvaVH3JfeiTzGX8r4EoOf6+OBdcDEDO/VuzSkAb+zcJqUjLGP9mcyitNxdUlMMFt9LmAqi1g4K/X9Z8VXlK+oosTYPjvYxj0jBPBkd9BRA9danT4GFcqgT7g== Received: from [IPV6:2a03:7900:64::1000] ([2a03:7900:64::1000]) by icewarp.tuxis.nl (12.1.1 build 4 DEB9 x64) with ASMTP (SSL) id 202106291404068775; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:04:06 +0200 Message-ID: <152e5dc5-8b0c-f182-4d85-1e1b3639209a@tuxis.nl> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:04:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/90.0 Content-Language: nl To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE user list References: <5377d815-bde4-9ca8-8584-ff63a6eb27ba@proxmox.com> <0d129a03-9a70-e123-5e5a-e7862ef303ac@tuxis.nl> From: Mark Schouten In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A782F26.60DAF681.005A,ss=3,sh,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=3,cld=1,fgs=0"; Spam="Bulk"; VOD="Unknown" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.750 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [tuxis.nl] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 7.0 (beta) released! X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:04:08 -0000 Hi, Op 29-06-2021 om 12:31 schreef Thomas Lamprecht: >> I do not completely understand why that fixes it though.  Commenting out MACAddressPolicy=persistent helps, but why? >> > > Because duplicate MAC addresses are not ideal, to say the least? That I understand. :) But, the cluster interface works when bridge_vlan_aware is off, regardless of the MacAddressPolicy setting. -- Mark Schouten CTO, Tuxis B.V. | https://www.tuxis.nl/ | +31 318 200208