From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C1A6650A for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 03:14:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 86E7813423 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 03:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C6E2E1340B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 03:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id m16so6355858pls.5 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:14:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=xdzna3JC19E/wytyG01oNmJ/ovRPMD250Ae0Z2UAFg4=; b=o+xTzkIOO+tpc+D9eJMNmweSh7gGlORx6xEedN9LOh/wu1rihhPHPXbYqxnfRmg4b9 rB5L1RzhC2eChVB98SlPypllCErmEyMDU2e9kGl/1UCcORU/sm1VR9TVqboqruPj3ki5 LQ96JFRqinSfDBXGYyuGGNL30JSkTzCjRvpXhIw0Iw7mph2RiLa5kTAcC5pMwFDmlhDU 8Y6aoLKVC1kma4lVGo56wV++PtQoO2m5Vk4XxljemhI+ZiCymHc/x/6CgEvg6A0yJhsm fSZn68XYoUWNMOXXbJifAUPNy188lyXaDbtmW7FEo1xeJjJyOlmpHIaD714DvS8OMeVw u07Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=xdzna3JC19E/wytyG01oNmJ/ovRPMD250Ae0Z2UAFg4=; b=o7auigP6BhdAxZjmhMm4W2Hx2kSZYaVQmDJC1IWpeAVyWlNq+GpJK/lkTBvlXiaF/M wagPK5iEqfek1k6ZdhbWsm+3IFnZjaFeZvyURNBz0jVeR5F6vFqjfVAl67uS9QPlpAyu ipkPIVoC60xTvNJpCdpMXL02klDzNVH3u9eZzzO3Yb9IaNFUZSx94Bmws2df0pfekSrr uGObIKHsQ+VTnRDwenbQ1Bf+HFf2Use/YV5lybhPYaSPO7Q7bknoYGlPEbKez6NVkR6L UTtqVrBbSJc4BuLTzj707fHd6COHcSYxATABpBy6jiEWW3cg7FCYzk7+va+JK0gLrovA rvnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533L232rAh4G7WpHy1Pv2jgM1FRhqeNyJ/vTOPeJCgcIgXu/Whht sBtSk2oDJsOFdQcGRZT7OPQY8KxnZ4YoMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2Wh/4eSRtunPSaQBF8ezrmuytig8Fvl74BNzdD7qLIU+itAzkxhbuJuPUaS21rISH3hyRUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cc0f:: with SMTP id b15mr12101981pju.83.1595726058229; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm3044042pgh.9.2020.07.25.18.14.16 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:14:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Lindsay Mathieson To: Proxmox VE user list References: <88d992dc-5d46-f639-bd63-a721d0a51ab2@gmail.com> Message-ID: <134f41a7-1c51-53ea-7144-78a73e7a709b@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:14:10 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <88d992dc-5d46-f639-bd63-a721d0a51ab2@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.171 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NICE_REPLY_A -0.343 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Can't migrate my HA VM's X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 01:14:56 -0000 Ok, I resolved the issue, though maybe it exposes a problem? I had a test Proxmox Backup server Beta, which I took down and erased, but I left the storage entry. Once I deleted the Storage entry, the HA VM's were able to migrate. Would seem to be an issue if HA VM's can't be migrated if a backup server is down. On 26/07/2020 11:08 am, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > > Have this error start today when I attempt to migrate my HA managed VM's > > task started by HA resource agent > 2020-07-26 10:55:00 starting migration of VM 101 to node 'vnb' > (192.168.5.240) > 2020-07-26 10:55:02 ERROR: Failed to sync data - proxmox-backup-client > failed: Error: error trying to connect: tcp connect error: No route to > host (os error 113) > 2020-07-26 10:55:02 aborting phase 1 - cleanup resources > 2020-07-26 10:55:02 ERROR: migration aborted (duration 00:00:02): > Failed to sync data - proxmox-backup-client failed: Error: error > trying to connect: tcp connect error: No route to host (os error 113) > TASK ERROR: migration aborted > > > All servers are pingable from each other (static entries in host > files). If I remove the VM from HA it migrates fine. Dunno when this > started, but I used to be able to migrate HA managed VM's. > > > All updates applied, non-subscription repository. > > > Haven't tested restarting any services yet. > > -- > Lindsay -- Lindsay