From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C13496515 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:24:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 556F8184BA for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:24:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:24:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a3122b70439so236058266b.3 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:24:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709234650; x=1709839450; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=L5gySl9pfXhAf4n+C1A5L+ZmlToJxHsheET94N6vzkU=; b=fe4pRDW36BwJ/yHU9FhmACTIH8GW5aaDuR3jHsfJqoDAMOHk2Cbq1n2iK0q9iFTOzw 4aGiT5HG4vOGWIvDQrSE93ZvGny06T6PF77Y9tfVBn8K7EWdP14G8Z+CEkTzqKgWJyZP 5Omj0U07jtgIGrbLT+Wl6giEA8CvJI+ks709cu9pulluLHsdhLK/nLZUlsy/8pA6mTgv +u31NmTzx8m+3bCxcaX0M9rGKTxLaZtdvfh9YdI74WO7W6ye5wtsnnfuInja3KB3QIAv 3Y+b1B4gy+QD4Pdr5KT63BlZQME3l85laGwX3ku3YpOsHEkAqUgEJ4o43cM+QmxdEPeV IXSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709234650; x=1709839450; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=L5gySl9pfXhAf4n+C1A5L+ZmlToJxHsheET94N6vzkU=; b=oCfAsZ95U1kj6GIeAZbvHU/24DLF1W+hz+Q1paBIMD46rbKzAEvw/S/HCm8avt9InN umf1/QEsmnkLcQdOuQX1+d8y/Fn8MvFT/rEQp7Vrr8ZWWiRmYqNPXiAbca7aFaVWYaLh Zd+WPXM4Affm3yiuUy9xQztjtAB/s3byscHOAjCOIO/EDWSVWqiFwmybDe3KoBgzeG0T gDKdfHnyYGl1yzZNHjAuZoU0YyJuLQBMTZjVVFLAmbkcUZB2BRgwdXcqk8spGzUWJF7P txNrbKulN3jCJqmhoOpGg2yF7ynFt//7QvvoHJ3EqmGd4MNhNwUFr/3xp4D1IaduFgMV ViXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzmLuTQZw02MLRsTz715Wlbfh02u8EJSrk7qvGK2xcwrBxlnsz3 ftIkGkmzZ8CFk6JcpLp+zrrd6LfO+I7p1fTsV+lxYpE/JbLuk7Nh00uN3geF X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGYJF9g+36DSp3kxjvzhiNsN24BGanZwnq++Lb6ohRP8OXEsWSI+hCwYF56VreQwLc7eoRA4A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e20b:b0:a44:a5a:30be with SMTP id gf11-20020a170906e20b00b00a440a5a30bemr2081223ejb.2.1709234649515; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:24:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a280:2d80:fed2:519c:5763:6b1b? ([2a02:8070:a280:2d80:fed2:519c:5763:6b1b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12-20020a1709066acc00b00a440846650bsm959273ejs.184.2024.02.29.11.24.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:24:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0fe68fd5-1d64-428e-889b-c5ec6eb24860@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:24:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: Proxmox VE user list References: From: Uwe Sauter In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.153 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] pve wiki docs wrong -- shared zfs via iscsi isn't possible X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:24:47 -0000 I think "shared" is used in the sense of "can be accessed from different hosts" but not "simultaniously". Like every other block device that is available over the network it is up to the file system to coordinate simultaniously access. ZFS is unable to do so. But that doesn't mean that it cannot be used from different hosts (at different times). So this depends on your POV whether ZFS over iSCSI is "shared". But technically "shared: true" is right. Am 29.02.24 um 20:05 schrieb Roland via pve-user: > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user