From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D7C078910 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 04:48:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A70FCAAE for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 04:48:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DB40DCAA1 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 04:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id v191so389129pfc.8 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:48:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=ZBOhsgB4ySZclTJPVkHok9gh+3Mqu8WDLCUcoFh9p7U=; b=dMC7hktDqPc/QCw6bp8UXJ8FfaFGMY58ipGq6EGIzXC1zxzBZC5DK7Ib+/fkJhA3ax gOQop3K/JoT1ZKEhvYKkcZqLECbyTT1POtkfC3CeVhX8h3wxhxlWge9nuyg7pSfB0eNE 39Bx+Jn94kob0+2Tk3jNY5rAp+HHab0bUI58tG8JWnXJChf0rRI56WIBH4jl712W8Bxh ftAzAXMmdbq+OW31GcMQlxXIy5YiDH/7lKacKFcdvAdeM2DA7XrCAL8aIufvKyQhrN/y 9DGORRuxmDDo0H2bbnhuyScW7EO1wwYYnTvxng7yLsoEDKhEYNH40UwawclME/rD2RDj TmNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=ZBOhsgB4ySZclTJPVkHok9gh+3Mqu8WDLCUcoFh9p7U=; b=sgVCCbVk5e1X4eTQehhFxwdZ1cGQSr9OyFrbvZyU0pNv+vYqhLA/9FLXeeZ4cbAmzc T4Qm1mpXaaAxtYMX6dYflbhbKVwo6gKzteYEAq/eTIGG4uWZsExAJcShL+3z8IMoJ0C+ 5t58tuhugdpKoj19MxKcG1X2/32Vggp7khG+vkort7EVZNEdaZg6M/pyvKqKo/sxc1CZ k/m8aDtx3xZOzkNOCk17N9QSNVpGS6N2s7/rxMUrfFDa1r5RQ1UIR6lReeI4ChZEKxtB 3gBeEcSD+L9ILC9QvgB7tmpCxTcjfCn8sAC0QBGo1nOlKFQPLlnyDZAGe5UV3UvNc7Bc 6ysA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aO+Qok/e/W7yTde2YjrjzaLBeKTWSTZW70ibRXdfy+j9tFDeo 5WWj+/B2l4v9XcEcISbhEA/WyKv1CjdTdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYzbOEHsBJoK35c5MgGWjL9LaH2sAVyiuuB5LFWdSpVtTlhbNY4+6n5VrIHMP/dP/MV3rmfw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8108:0:b029:288:f412:ce44 with SMTP id b8-20020aa781080000b0290288f412ce44mr6727271pfi.52.1619837294536; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.125] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e68sm3251402pfa.78.2021.04.30.19.48.12 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:48:13 -0700 (PDT) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <4817f902-0e8b-5ecc-fc0d-8bfccc255bd8@proxmox.com> From: Lindsay Mathieson Message-ID: <0f85eeee-3ebe-3e91-e32d-7831ea8999f4@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 12:48:07 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4817f902-0e8b-5ecc-fc0d-8bfccc255bd8@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.114 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 6.4 released X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 02:48:24 -0000 On 28/04/2021 7:56 pm, Martin Maurer wrote: > We are proud to announce the general availability of Proxmox Virtual > Environment 6.4, our open-source virtualization platform. This version > brings unified single-file restore for virtual machine (VM) and > container (CT) backup archives stored on a Proxmox Backup Server as > well as live restore of VM backup archives located on a Proxmox Backup > Server. > > Version 6.4 also comes with Ceph Octopus 15.2.11 and Ceph Nautilus > 14.2.20, many enhancements to KVM/QEMU, and notable bug fixes. Many > new Ceph-specific management features have been added to the GUI. We > have improved the integration of the placement group (PG) auto-scaler, > and you can configure Target Size or Target Ratio settings in the GUI. Did a rolling upgrade on a 5 node ceph cluster, 6.3 => latest, rebooted all nodes. No issues at all. I did notice that on the dist-upgrade, the grub update generated a number of errors: The following packages will be REMOVED:   pve-kernel-5.4.78-2-pve 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 288 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 133531 files and directories currently installed.) Removing pve-kernel-5.4.78-2-pve (5.4.78-2) ... Examining /etc/kernel/prerm.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/prerm.d/dkms 5.4.78-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.78-2-pve Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 5.4.78-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.78-2-pve update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-5.4.78-2-pve run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/proxmox-auto-removal 5.4.78-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.78-2-pve run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-proxmox-boot 5.4.78-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.78-2-pve Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-proxmox-boot' in new private mount namespace.. No /etc/kernel/proxmox-boot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 5.4.78-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.78-2-pve Generating grub configuration file ...   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.106-1-pve Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.106-1-pve Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.98-1-pve Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.98-1-pve Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-5.3.18-3-pve Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-5.3.18-3-pve Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-4.19.0-14-amd64 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-4.19.0-14-amd64 Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-4.19.0-13-amd64 Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-4.19.0-13-amd64   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address   /dev/sdg: open failed: No such device or address Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.bin Found memtest86+ multiboot image: /memtest86+_multiboot.bin But on reboot all devices where available, not sure if there is any significance to that. Thanks! -- Lindsay