From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lists@merit.unu.edu>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD9D6602C4
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  8 Sep 2020 13:26:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B9F1295BA
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  8 Sep 2020 13:25:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.merit.unu.edu (webmail.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.6])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 09AF495AD
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  8 Sep 2020 13:25:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.242.6.4] (unknown [10.242.6.4])
 by mail.merit.unu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C0F9806E666A
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  8 Sep 2020 13:18:34 +0200 (CEST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
From: mj <lists@merit.unu.edu>
Message-ID: <0f278b38-a74f-efe7-606e-41d25cac34a9@merit.unu.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:18:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.350 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: [PVE-User] asking for 5->6 upgrade feedback (meshed ceph network)
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:26:12 -0000

Hi,

We're still on (latest) pve5/ceph, with the three-host 'mesh network' 
type. (https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Full_Mesh_Network_for_Ceph_Server)

Of course we want to upgrade to 6, and I would like to ask here: 
anything special to watch out for? Is it considered a dangerous upgrade, 
or should it normally work out fine?

We have of course studied the upgrading wiki page 
(https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_5.x_to_6.0)

Just looking for some feedback of those who have done it, preferably 
someone also using the full_mesh_network type for ceph.

Was it an easy upgrade..? Anything in particular to watch out for?

Thanks!

MJ