From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ralf.storm@konzept-is.de>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1401707C2
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D7D68D6EA
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from styx18.konzept-is.de (styx18.konzept-is.de [212.62.202.218])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CF26AD6D9
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:13:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.10.38] (unknown [10.10.10.38])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: storm)
 by styx18.konzept-is.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 589FD1FD8A
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:08:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <5377d815-bde4-9ca8-8584-ff63a6eb27ba@proxmox.com>
From: Ralf Storm <ralf.storm@konzept-is.de>
Message-ID: <087e4881-4b9c-791f-77d6-30f826152bd5@konzept-is.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:08:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5377d815-bde4-9ca8-8584-ff63a6eb27ba@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [PVE-User] Error updating Ceph from Nautilus to Octopus
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:13:28 -0000

Hello,

I upgraded my nodes according to the instructions in the Proxmox wiki.

After restarting the monitors and managers i restarted the first 2 osds 
and saw the following error in syslog:

fsck warning: #6:fc6c85f8:::rbd_header.08a3e84bf25fd0:head# has omap 
that is not per-pool or pgmeta

I am unsure if this is bad or not - anyone had this before or knows if 
it is a problem?


With best regards

Ralf Storm