From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mcooper@coopfire.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6422ED79C
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:17:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 493E43BDD
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:16:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:16:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id
 3f1490d57ef6-c5e76dfcc36so3446452276.2
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=coopfire-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1689495392; x=1692087392; 
 h=in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language
 :subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=J9ttaU8STtEp+rzKlB3cTVuNYN02T6LURCdE37ychWE=;
 b=IxbBPuY8K2dnggDqrKZgKjKbmv3mLuugEYWOd8psxNPg4ZWDFR/7Vd5CQ3vEN5CHr+
 hp/z7YnThT2XWAdJAIBxH20kJtslr0Uw/vSzjm+zXunLlM7bjhhAWtR29Svj1kXtKZcF
 LK+36B9ek28bOGpTtYWamIZQCs9UmcGEKJpMjtbqapuzk7OrpwiFLzpMXz9kNjBVJnCm
 FLvJWGCQkK034UNcu/9W2Rf7xVn/1h/p1itik/yFEczsBhSJpO/CvGbc7gPC+/QRTlyq
 k0RKZbK4Pp5kpFdbCWMDyeQYjPwZZQLWzlKN3z424kPo4HaAQ7q1C1FYSC0EVZ/8FG2p
 dcMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689495392; x=1692087392;
 h=in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language
 :subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=J9ttaU8STtEp+rzKlB3cTVuNYN02T6LURCdE37ychWE=;
 b=YacjsfKcCmvXZBG/VP/okpF0xuV+Mw3y7GOmysigLKJvS5aqy1nw7fVy9p/fuFddSo
 A76HqKclo+T8GSplgWR7zTFlwhDUtnkDRuJlE4IyShOv487f4OtNhQeE+ptYmu/lVqdR
 8nUJhm83c0npvktfr9eZslLA0EihrA3akNoNNboKPRwYDY63AUhF4lEP6ObmqUBEKQyn
 UTKD8T26XNFphRbeG7Q5Yq3jTo6pEa0beNUqU4/7ZJ7kfSLuC8kD807O/cMNI9i6XEuQ
 cTkxWkxFieMv/LaisLLnMBc0347vmoqHBszjjWjl5l9UZ3VfEeoqzHiRAXfz2ta6Ak39
 3v4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZkRsP/oaxwFqf6vYaDcGvsiveOZugKObvHy8w8T9/hSh89s7FE
 yxgQS8fYBj0MmRpJJ3rcDKuCBWHWuS8qJcwwYnyZAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEcJAjtnsuA0bdDeFgloC8gFiXe7n7L0C+PPNAsXPPWm1eEwPsifNzbH2aebjnH+2jluiz40w==
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d596:0:b0:577:65ea:78fb with SMTP id
 x144-20020a0dd596000000b0057765ea78fbmr9399563ywd.19.1689495391461; 
 Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.33] (cpe-74-140-101-113.columbus.res.rr.com.
 [74.140.101.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 h126-20020a0df784000000b00559f1cb8444sm3232951ywf.70.2023.07.16.01.16.30
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <049ed31a-5bdc-7ce3-d3d6-8a286b6a6e7a@coopfire.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 04:16:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Reply-To: mcooper@coopfire.com
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <A177D562-9D34-4C99-8FFC-FB2D774E1334@uni-tuebingen.de>
 <mailman.238.1689454293.232.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <53E917EB-5D7E-4124-92B1-ED3A2E6A1D6E@uni-tuebingen.de>
From: Michael Cooper <mcooper@coopfire.com>
Organization: Coopfire Service
In-Reply-To: <53E917EB-5D7E-4124-92B1-ED3A2E6A1D6E@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 HTML_MESSAGE            0.001 HTML included in message
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.091 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_NONE                0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] vlan setup at time of host installation
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 08:17:11 -0000

Hello Guys,

I don't know if this is relevant but I thought I would chime in.

This is one is for Network Bonding in Proxmox -> Nic Bonding in Proxmox 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auMugO3zsKw>

This one is Bond Nics w/VLan Support in Proxmox 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIip66Rzt4I>


I apologize if this is not what you were wanting.

Thanks,

Michael

On 7/16/23 12:44 AM, Timo Veith wrote:
>
>> Am 15.07.2023 um 22:43 schrieb Arjen via pve-user<pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>:
>>
>>
>> Von: Arjen <leesteken+proxmox@pm.me  <mailto:leesteken+proxmox@pm.me>>
>> Betreff: Aw: [PVE-User] vlan setup at time of host installation
>> Datum: 15. Juli 2023 um 22:43:37 MESZ
>> An: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com  <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> On Saturday, July 15th, 2023 at 22:25, Timo Veith <timo.veith@uni-tuebingen.de  <mailto:timo.veith@uni-tuebingen.de>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear pve users,
>>>
>>> I am totally new to pve. Is there a recommended way to setup vlans during the installation of a host? I have found some notes about vlans in the documentation but it only describes some sections in /etc/network/interfaces but it doesn’t say when this should be done. In fact I did one of the proposed methods and I can connect to the management ip address in that vlan but I wonder if it was right how I did it. I installed from the iso, configured some ip because I didn’t find any option for using vlans in the installer and then searched through the documentation. I changed the /etc/network/interfaces and did a reboot. Where after I was able to connect to the ip address that I configured. However in the console I can still read „use blabla ip and port 8006“ which is the ip I used during the installation.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Timo
>> Don't panic; you did nothing wrong. The installer is rather simple and only does the basic installation.
>> It's common to setup more complex things (like vlan) after installation. If the Proxmox GUI does not support it, or is not (yet) reachable, you do those things on the Proxmox console.
>> The console welcome message probably takes the IP address from /etc/hosts, which you also need to manually adjust to match the new IP.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>
> Hello Arjen,
>
> thank you for your reply.
>
> I understand. Do you have some more common examples of cases where you can only configure that after the GUI installation and with the console?
>
> Greetings
> Timo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
-- 
*Michael Cooper*
/Systems Engineer/
Coopfire Services <http://www.coopfire.com>
>From stefan.radman@me.com  Sun Jul 16 17:07:15 2023
Return-Path: <stefan.radman@me.com>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF87D7D2
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:07:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 843775BD7
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:07:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from qs51p00im-qukt01071501.me.com (qs51p00im-qukt01071501.me.com
 [17.57.155.4])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:07:13 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai;
 t=1689519568; bh=QXLQZTsD7K8OmF35bgAQkja4ZA5zjs+9OAD9GTyP4rs=;
 h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Date:Subject:To;
 b=vTgYDhxawsDDDUEUCA94X5MtwsXS11tE7/BEEPgivUHjoxsXfcazUdn7MQ5LIAbvH
 2xc90AvFF6I2jUAZ4GPkbuPVTKGh7aOEDV17DSaWq1XaN/4ppB3TgAnt0+SxEd2Zgi
 h06Ae0yw0KEWSxSp+MiFTRsS/5WlP+VlE4OnJFQvoqfArS/iidS+qw0ps9K62Wczjt
 wWV+vt11HSg8k1akgUWvaryZ3w1JMaJkxBGxE3rWPHVX8/8Dx4Xg9cHGYPYPn5N3f0
 tB9kYS9d+A6wPiMJ+kyHJC3qLF8I/KjfP4gnpiW2yKOqMGV7zAxiGcEUQ0j43bsp1f
 GGffJ1dcFzTpw==
Received: from [10.0.0.15] (qs51p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com
 [17.57.155.28])
 by qs51p00im-qukt01071501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0EF51C407C5;
 Sun, 16 Jul 2023 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: Stefan Radman <stefan.radman@me.com>
Message-Id: <B1922D26-F5A8-4394-AD2C-DE8BF1E5272A@me.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 16:59:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] vlan setup at time of host installation
In-Reply-To: <A177D562-9D34-4C99-8FFC-FB2D774E1334@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <A177D562-9D34-4C99-8FFC-FB2D774E1334@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RfOtGXq0d97pjh-um9WTgbSNYUwgwduy
X-Proofpoint-GUID: RfOtGXq0d97pjh-um9WTgbSNYUwgwduy
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.425,18.0.572,17.0.605.474.0000000_definitions?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-01-11=5F01:2022-01-11=5F01,2020-02-14=5F11,2020-01-23?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?=5F02_signatures=3D0?=
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0
 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0
 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999
 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2307160141
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.132 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain DMARC_PASS               -0.1 DMARC pass policy
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 HTML_MESSAGE            0.001 HTML included in message
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW        -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4       0.001 Very Good reputation (+4)
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL       0.001 Mailspike good senders
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:07:15 -0000

Hi Timo

See =
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#_default_configurat=
ion_using_a_bridge =
<https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#_default_configura=
tion_using_a_bridge>
3.3.4. Default Configuration using a Bridge =
<https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#_default_configura=
tion_using_a_bridge>
The installation program creates a single bridge named vmbr0, which is =
connected to the first Ethernet card.=20

The Proxmox VE installer does not support vlan tagging during the =
installation.
At time of installation all traffic is untagged.

Once you have access to the management GUI (through the management IP =
address provided during installation) you can complete the network =
configuration and configure VLAN tagging.
=
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#sysadmin_network_vl=
an =
<https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#sysadmin_network_v=
lan>
Select node > Network > Create > Linux VLAN

Stefan

> On Jul 15, 2023, at 22:25, Timo Veith <timo.veith@uni-tuebingen.de> =
wrote:
>=20
> Dear pve users,
>=20
> I am totally new to pve. Is there a recommended way to setup vlans =
during the installation of a host? I have found some notes about vlans =
in the documentation but it only describes some sections in =
/etc/network/interfaces but it doesn=E2=80=99t say when this should be =
done. In fact I did one of the proposed methods and I can connect to the =
management ip address in that vlan but I wonder if it was right how I =
did it. I installed from the iso, configured some ip because I didn=E2=80=99=
t find any option for using vlans in the installer and then searched =
through the documentation. I changed the /etc/network/interfaces and did =
a reboot. Where after I was able to connect to the ip address that I =
configured. However in the console I can still read =E2=80=9Euse blabla =
ip and port 8006=E2=80=9C which is the ip I used during the =
installation.=20
>=20
> Cheers
> Timo_______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user