From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6422ED79C for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:17:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 493E43BDD for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:16:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-c5e76dfcc36so3446452276.2 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coopfire-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1689495392; x=1692087392; h=in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J9ttaU8STtEp+rzKlB3cTVuNYN02T6LURCdE37ychWE=; b=IxbBPuY8K2dnggDqrKZgKjKbmv3mLuugEYWOd8psxNPg4ZWDFR/7Vd5CQ3vEN5CHr+ hp/z7YnThT2XWAdJAIBxH20kJtslr0Uw/vSzjm+zXunLlM7bjhhAWtR29Svj1kXtKZcF LK+36B9ek28bOGpTtYWamIZQCs9UmcGEKJpMjtbqapuzk7OrpwiFLzpMXz9kNjBVJnCm FLvJWGCQkK034UNcu/9W2Rf7xVn/1h/p1itik/yFEczsBhSJpO/CvGbc7gPC+/QRTlyq k0RKZbK4Pp5kpFdbCWMDyeQYjPwZZQLWzlKN3z424kPo4HaAQ7q1C1FYSC0EVZ/8FG2p dcMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689495392; x=1692087392; h=in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J9ttaU8STtEp+rzKlB3cTVuNYN02T6LURCdE37ychWE=; b=YacjsfKcCmvXZBG/VP/okpF0xuV+Mw3y7GOmysigLKJvS5aqy1nw7fVy9p/fuFddSo A76HqKclo+T8GSplgWR7zTFlwhDUtnkDRuJlE4IyShOv487f4OtNhQeE+ptYmu/lVqdR 8nUJhm83c0npvktfr9eZslLA0EihrA3akNoNNboKPRwYDY63AUhF4lEP6ObmqUBEKQyn UTKD8T26XNFphRbeG7Q5Yq3jTo6pEa0beNUqU4/7ZJ7kfSLuC8kD807O/cMNI9i6XEuQ cTkxWkxFieMv/LaisLLnMBc0347vmoqHBszjjWjl5l9UZ3VfEeoqzHiRAXfz2ta6Ak39 3v4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZkRsP/oaxwFqf6vYaDcGvsiveOZugKObvHy8w8T9/hSh89s7FE yxgQS8fYBj0MmRpJJ3rcDKuCBWHWuS8qJcwwYnyZAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEcJAjtnsuA0bdDeFgloC8gFiXe7n7L0C+PPNAsXPPWm1eEwPsifNzbH2aebjnH+2jluiz40w== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d596:0:b0:577:65ea:78fb with SMTP id x144-20020a0dd596000000b0057765ea78fbmr9399563ywd.19.1689495391461; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.33] (cpe-74-140-101-113.columbus.res.rr.com. [74.140.101.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h126-20020a0df784000000b00559f1cb8444sm3232951ywf.70.2023.07.16.01.16.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <049ed31a-5bdc-7ce3-d3d6-8a286b6a6e7a@coopfire.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 04:16:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Reply-To: mcooper@coopfire.com Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <53E917EB-5D7E-4124-92B1-ED3A2E6A1D6E@uni-tuebingen.de> From: Michael Cooper Organization: Coopfire Service In-Reply-To: <53E917EB-5D7E-4124-92B1-ED3A2E6A1D6E@uni-tuebingen.de> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NICE_REPLY_A -0.091 Looks like a legit reply (A) POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] vlan setup at time of host installation X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 08:17:11 -0000 Hello Guys, I don't know if this is relevant but I thought I would chime in. This is one is for Network Bonding in Proxmox -> Nic Bonding in Proxmox This one is Bond Nics w/VLan Support in Proxmox I apologize if this is not what you were wanting. Thanks, Michael On 7/16/23 12:44 AM, Timo Veith wrote: > >> Am 15.07.2023 um 22:43 schrieb Arjen via pve-user: >> >> >> Von: Arjen > >> Betreff: Aw: [PVE-User] vlan setup at time of host installation >> Datum: 15. Juli 2023 um 22:43:37 MESZ >> An: Proxmox VE user list > >> >> >> ------- Original Message ------- >> On Saturday, July 15th, 2023 at 22:25, Timo Veith > wrote: >> >>> Dear pve users, >>> >>> I am totally new to pve. Is there a recommended way to setup vlans during the installation of a host? I have found some notes about vlans in the documentation but it only describes some sections in /etc/network/interfaces but it doesn’t say when this should be done. In fact I did one of the proposed methods and I can connect to the management ip address in that vlan but I wonder if it was right how I did it. I installed from the iso, configured some ip because I didn’t find any option for using vlans in the installer and then searched through the documentation. I changed the /etc/network/interfaces and did a reboot. Where after I was able to connect to the ip address that I configured. However in the console I can still read „use blabla ip and port 8006“ which is the ip I used during the installation. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Timo >> Don't panic; you did nothing wrong. The installer is rather simple and only does the basic installation. >> It's common to setup more complex things (like vlan) after installation. If the Proxmox GUI does not support it, or is not (yet) reachable, you do those things on the Proxmox console. >> The console welcome message probably takes the IP address from /etc/hosts, which you also need to manually adjust to match the new IP. >> >> Best regards >> > > Hello Arjen, > > thank you for your reply. > > I understand. Do you have some more common examples of cases where you can only configure that after the GUI installation and with the console? > > Greetings > Timo > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user -- *Michael Cooper* /Systems Engineer/ Coopfire Services >From stefan.radman@me.com Sun Jul 16 17:07:15 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF87D7D2 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 843775BD7 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from qs51p00im-qukt01071501.me.com (qs51p00im-qukt01071501.me.com [17.57.155.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:07:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1689519568; bh=QXLQZTsD7K8OmF35bgAQkja4ZA5zjs+9OAD9GTyP4rs=; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Date:Subject:To; b=vTgYDhxawsDDDUEUCA94X5MtwsXS11tE7/BEEPgivUHjoxsXfcazUdn7MQ5LIAbvH 2xc90AvFF6I2jUAZ4GPkbuPVTKGh7aOEDV17DSaWq1XaN/4ppB3TgAnt0+SxEd2Zgi h06Ae0yw0KEWSxSp+MiFTRsS/5WlP+VlE4OnJFQvoqfArS/iidS+qw0ps9K62Wczjt wWV+vt11HSg8k1akgUWvaryZ3w1JMaJkxBGxE3rWPHVX8/8Dx4Xg9cHGYPYPn5N3f0 tB9kYS9d+A6wPiMJ+kyHJC3qLF8I/KjfP4gnpiW2yKOqMGV7zAxiGcEUQ0j43bsp1f GGffJ1dcFzTpw== Received: from [10.0.0.15] (qs51p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.57.155.28]) by qs51p00im-qukt01071501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0EF51C407C5; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Radman Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 16:59:25 +0200 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] vlan setup at time of host installation In-Reply-To: To: Proxmox VE user list References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RfOtGXq0d97pjh-um9WTgbSNYUwgwduy X-Proofpoint-GUID: RfOtGXq0d97pjh-um9WTgbSNYUwgwduy X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.425,18.0.572,17.0.605.474.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2022-01-11=5F01:2022-01-11=5F01,2020-02-14=5F11,2020-01-23?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F02_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2307160141 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.132 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 Very Good reputation (+4) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:07:15 -0000 Hi Timo See = https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#_default_configurat= ion_using_a_bridge = 3.3.4. Default Configuration using a Bridge = The installation program creates a single bridge named vmbr0, which is = connected to the first Ethernet card.=20 The Proxmox VE installer does not support vlan tagging during the = installation. At time of installation all traffic is untagged. Once you have access to the management GUI (through the management IP = address provided during installation) you can complete the network = configuration and configure VLAN tagging. = https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#sysadmin_network_vl= an = Select node > Network > Create > Linux VLAN Stefan > On Jul 15, 2023, at 22:25, Timo Veith = wrote: >=20 > Dear pve users, >=20 > I am totally new to pve. Is there a recommended way to setup vlans = during the installation of a host? I have found some notes about vlans = in the documentation but it only describes some sections in = /etc/network/interfaces but it doesn=E2=80=99t say when this should be = done. In fact I did one of the proposed methods and I can connect to the = management ip address in that vlan but I wonder if it was right how I = did it. I installed from the iso, configured some ip because I didn=E2=80=99= t find any option for using vlans in the installer and then searched = through the documentation. I changed the /etc/network/interfaces and did = a reboot. Where after I was able to connect to the ip address that I = configured. However in the console I can still read =E2=80=9Euse blabla = ip and port 8006=E2=80=9C which is the ip I used during the = installation.=20 >=20 > Cheers > Timo_______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user