From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F5969A4C for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:16:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2673934029 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:16:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A9E0434012 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:16:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id l22so4530726wme.1 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 01:16:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=lr2C9teQZZJi1WgJM8hZfKWTeenHXAkit8bcE3XE0pQ=; b=CntdM1UNPOOCZpwriEab1bvFi0AvrA4DAaAaR00ALPAKDIhI7Yy5CgtHsG47hki8zv R6Inn2DWXgleoSk9KqEWL3c1LzTtG+5YLSzxB6OsGITXLYzOtdIX/bU2c9eHUY/4N9BR GZTF149z0XlUhp1g72gJ+LoYZ6E8bjlq3ohM77D3czYi0X6iPhQxOEJvBwJNb8w8Dg0U tEh5nIkUFLN9OnJwB75yusBEaW+5UxuKTpvAMaByfppJPXT+4q9+JsjJL2Y4OHKuOmZt EKuSZCsfjpdgjqjjWmAMpMFg7M+shN1sOoeKwxouDfJAENt8zZrmi7ugPDYXSv43gxVr 1aeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lr2C9teQZZJi1WgJM8hZfKWTeenHXAkit8bcE3XE0pQ=; b=Lag+a82HhuDNzVheKs01JYoOSytxvXvcGF41hodj5b/bxaOdA0h5LGIyH0t+7c26Vv o8ZLCz4sjJhxi5l/BnwDBxxunpK2TfPWjTV2QK3Q3WswLbdWw0M3kkhJx9GpUgkbIijQ /fX2WY/ecr1ftPyHRoCpifoQeLLPeB+Q06QFccyadVQJGU42YlR29W5ENxFzlByuufCr DxTl6pK+RW/tJTfe94xuSaqhHzApxgNTP0E9ZeshDcTmg8IFdxlgJ8hLy2nIO5qLpEbU cCWZ3E/2SS/jCZvXL7LPlnDFk6lO/+1ayt4DAgu7CKFdpD7RLbDKdXUqNJfdAEsqJZGl tmpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533T1eyqWASl9mapEQhAyLpDzbi9cMNGoHE918wdbfF1+RFLpXP7 vxOQhviRaY0bzo8wCcEyA+9h29pXHae2oQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8TKI6rT/mz+zGDNxF75PVI0vb1v+wNtfE0tR4akKJ6UIUcfNONhFkSNubeg2mnNB9OonFZg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6605:: with SMTP id a5mr8249438wmc.85.1614762976318; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 01:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm26258737wrr.10.2021.03.03.01.16.15 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 01:16:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <048e4a73b9243606c94656180c00d0f9735a5346.camel@odiso.com> From: aderumier@odiso.com To: Proxmox VE user list Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:16:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.105 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:16:55 -0000 if you use ifupdown2, it'll use "auto ..." this is because ifupdown2 is able to manage relationship. The web interface will setup correct configuration for you if you use ifupdown2 or ifupdown1. Le mardi 02 mars 2021 à 12:23 +0800, Hongyi Zhao a écrit : > If I create an OVS Bridge with the Autostart option using pve's web > interface, the following configuration will be generated: > > auto vmbr0 > iface vmbr0 inet manual > ovs_type OVSBridge > > OTOH, the examples given on the wiki website > use the following format: > > allow-ovs vmbr0 > iface vmbr0 inet manual >   ovs_type OVSBridge > > So, I want to know if the "allow-ovs" and "auto" keywords are > equivalent in the context for my above scenario. Any hints will be > appreciated. > > Regards