From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E33B728 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A3B12C378 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-36.di.u-psud.fr (smtp-out-36.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.213.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-2.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4NHtZN4JFHz1gHB for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from pmx2.di.u-psud.fr (pmx2.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.153]) by smtp-out-2.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4NHtZN46nKzbvpJ for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-in-2.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (UPS-PMX) with SMTP id 4NHtZN3wH9z1r4GP for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.212.70] (smtps.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.70]) (UPS-MTA) (Authenticated sender: alain.pean via 192.168.71.7) with ESMTPSA id 4NHtZN0Zbvz8BZ for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:12 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: smtps.u-psud.fr; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Message-ID: <031d4a60-f30c-f5f6-8978-fd8ed7aa0ef7@c2n.upsaclay.fr> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:52:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Reply-To: alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Content-Language: fr To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alain_P=c3=a9an?= In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NHtZN0Zbvz8BZ X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.447 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) PLING_QUERY 0.1 Subject has exclamation mark and question mark RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001 Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] OfflineUncorrectableSector, and now?! X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:52:19 -0000 Le 24/11/2022 à 09:02, Daniel Berteaud via pve-user a écrit : >> Can i safely ignore this? There's some way to say to smartctl that '8 Offline >> uncorrectable sectors' are good, and go over? > The SSD is most likely about to die, and I'd change it ASAP Yes, this is something you can verify in IDRAC, storage, physical disks, wear leveling. Alain -- Administrateur Système/Réseau C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255