From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE2A1FF15E for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:28:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1F65D10E36; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:28:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:27:36 +0100 From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com> To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Message-ID: <y2clgc44m4ncr3r3lvaaqqgbbip3cn3szobqhck5ptdzh2jlo7@3qpek57hzjuz> Mail-Followup-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, "t.lamprecht@proxmox.com" <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>, Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20250307122945.307426-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> <qxlna3q2jgdz32mnggazxcs3ijapk3ifhdl5ucsxszjjspg5ho@4f2npflcjb35> <mailman.967.1741691474.293.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <mailman.967.1741691474.293.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20241002-35-39f9a6 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/4] frr: bump from 8.5.2 to 10.2.1 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Cc: "t.lamprecht@proxmox.com" <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> On 11.03.2025 10:56, DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel wrote: >Hi, > >Nice to see that new proxmox developpers are working on it. > > >Personally, I would wait for major pve9 before bumping frr, This seems sensible, also because it's quite a big bump (two major versions). We'd also have to hold back the fabrics auto-dummy-interface-creation feature then. >because from my experience, I had a lot of regression with frr, (really >a lot ^_^) > >and this really need a lot of test with different setup to be sure >everything is working fine with differents setup. > > >I can begin to do test on my production with this version if it can >help Thanks! _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel