From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B1241FF168 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:07:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 480E81CD4E; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:07:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:07:53 +0100 From: Christoph Heiss To: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: References: <20240816161942.2044889-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> <6d3d0221-4e39-4a4b-976d-0a3540e41bb6@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d3d0221-4e39-4a4b-976d-0a3540e41bb6@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH installer] buildsys: add static version of proxmox-auto-install-assistant X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:31:05PM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 16.08.24 um 18:19 schrieb Christoph Heiss: > > This adds a separate debian package to the build, containing a > > statically-built version of `proxmox-auto-install-assistant`, as > > was suggested in #4788 [0] (for proxmox-backup-client), separately by > > Thomas also. > > [..] > > --- > > Marked RFC to see if the packaging is overall sane -- I haven't done a > > lot of (Debian) packaging yet, so please don't hesitate with > > suggestions. > > That looks alright to me, only open question is IMO if we want to have the > compat symlink or avoid that and allow installing both in parallel (mostly > useful for testing, but slightly worse UX for users, no hard feelings here) I would side with the better UX side of things. While yes, makes having both installed at the same impossible, I don't think we should necessarily degrade ease-of-testing over better UX. Also, since it is a static binary after all, building and/or grabbing it from e.g. some share for testing would be easy enough TBH. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel