From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0729E1FF13B for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 15:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C582B9BAA; Wed, 20 May 2026 15:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 15:43:56 +0200 From: Gabriel Goller To: Thomas Lamprecht Subject: Re: [PATCH network] ui: sdn: fabrics: drop dead disabled bindings Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Lamprecht , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260520125125.251655-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> <35f6dcd7-29db-4b72-98bb-bb9cfefc6ded@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <35f6dcd7-29db-4b72-98bb-bb9cfefc6ded@proxmox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20241002-35-39f9a6 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779284620759 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: HADRBBTYTDB3UWRWTRL4UIM557QQBGPJ X-Message-ID-Hash: HADRBBTYTDB3UWRWTRL4UIM557QQBGPJ X-MailFrom: g.goller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 20.05.2026 15:35, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > FYI, as this happened yesterday on some series: this subject format prefix suggests > that this is a patch for (pve-)network, but its actually also for pve-manager, like > the rest of the series. This confuses b4 a bit ^^ Ah oops, I am juggling a few patches and got confused. Sorry.