From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCB61FF133 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:40:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 50A9A100CE; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:40:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 11:40:38 +0200 From: Gabriel Goller To: Christoph Heiss Subject: Re: [PATCH installer 0/8] add IPv6 SLAAC and v6-only support Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Heiss , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260508184546.113293-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260508184546.113293-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20241002-35-39f9a6 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778492327625 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: M3FAIPUOW56F27IGTENIMNBEQVGRKNUG X-Message-ID-Hash: M3FAIPUOW56F27IGTENIMNBEQVGRKNUG X-MailFrom: g.goller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Not familiar enough with the installer code for a code review, but I gave it a quick spin. I ran a few installations using both GUI and terminal mode with different prefixes, always using radvd. Everything worked great! Consider: Tested-by: Gabriel Goller