From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F509368B
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:55:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1578C1AC50
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:55:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5136042C87
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <s8o5xwqrhnt.fsf@proxmox.com> (Maximiliano Sandoval's message of
"Tue, 09 Apr 2024 11:48:06 +0200")
References: <20240402145523.683008-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com>
<s8o5xwqrhnt.fsf@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.3; emacs 29.2
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 11:55:04 +0200
Message-ID: <s8ozfu2q2rr.fsf@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.013 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v5 pve-storage,
pve-manager 00/11] Fix #4759: Configure Permissions for
ceph-crash.service
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:55:06 -0000
Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com> writes:
> Max Carrara <m.carrara@proxmox.com> writes:
>
>> Fix #4759: Configure Permissions for ceph-crash.service - Version 5
>> ===================================================================
>
> I tested this patch series on a testing cluster updated to
> no-subscription with ceph-base 18.2.2-pve1. For the purposes of testing
> I removed the version check against 0.0.0.
I forgot to mention that `ceph status` now reports the crashes in its
health status:
```
# ceph status
cluster:
id: bb91405d-a19b-49e7-b13f-a708d2e8e38c
health: HEALTH_WARN
20 mgr modules have recently crashed
```
and that the count gets bumped correctly with a few minutes of delay.
--
Maximiliano