From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E2F1FF15C
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 709A6CA61;
Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:20:18 +0100 (CET)
References: <20241210151130.321984-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<20241210151130.321984-4-g.goller@proxmox.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 29.4
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:57:15 +0100
In-reply-to: <20241210151130.321984-4-g.goller@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <s8osequb62h.fsf@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.107 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container v2 3/3] api: return all addresses
of an interface
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com> writes:
> + "ip-addresses" => {
> + type => 'array',
> + description => 'All the Addresses of the interface',
> + optional => 0,
> + items => {
> + type => 'object',
I feel 'The addresses of the interface' sounds a bit better. But no
strong opinion.
Is it intentional that `Addresses` is capitalized? If this is Header
Capitalization then the word "interface" should be capitalized too.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel