From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 809AD1FF180 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 13:31:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2DA2217981; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 13:32:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Lukas Wagner In-Reply-To: <20250801095431.117317-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> (Lukas Wagner's message of "Fri, 1 Aug 2025 11:54:27 +0200") References: <20250801095431.117317-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 13:32:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754047918525 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.095 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH cluster 1/5] pmxcfs: status: add one more missing g_free X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Lukas Wagner writes: > Otherwise we leak the memory that was already allocated for `filename`. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner > --- > src/pmxcfs/status.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/pmxcfs/status.c b/src/pmxcfs/status.c > index a00e793..886d0bd 100644 > --- a/src/pmxcfs/status.c > +++ b/src/pmxcfs/status.c > @@ -1369,6 +1369,8 @@ static void update_rrd_data(const char *key, gconstpointer data, size_t len) { > } else if (g_file_test(filename_pve2, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS)) { > // old file exists, use it > use_pve2_file = 1; > + > + g_free(filename); > filename = g_strdup_printf("%s", filename_pve2); > } else { > // neither file exists, check for directories to decide and create file I tested this series against a 9.0 (beta) cluster and I didn't see anything off while writing data to the pmxcfs. I also did a light review of the code and it looks good. Tested-by: Maximiliano Sandoval Reviewed-by: Maximiliano Sandoval -- Maximiliano _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel