From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7368293598
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Apr 2024 11:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5B4721A26D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Apr 2024 11:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Apr 2024 11:22:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9CF8042DB7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  9 Apr 2024 11:22:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231123160902.282661-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> (Lukas Wagner's
 message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:09:01 +0100")
References: <20231123160902.282661-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.3; emacs 29.2
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 11:22:07 +0200
Message-ID: <s8obk6iriv4.fsf@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.013 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/2] ui: dc: backup: improve UX for
 the different 'notification-mode's
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:22:09 -0000

Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com> writes:

>   - Switch order of 'mailto' and 'mailnotification' field
>   - When mode is 'auto', disable 'mailtnotification' field
>   - When mode is 'auto' and 'mailto' is empty, show
>     hint that the notification system will be used
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
> ---

ping =F0=9F=91=BB

--
Maximiliano