From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39B41FF0E5 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3C4F72133E; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:56:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Kaiyang Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH container] setup: fedora: disable static units when fixing up template In-Reply-To: <2d147605-1557-4c18-a703-0faba3821bff@gmail.com> (Kaiyang Wu's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:41:36 +0800") References: <20260708101037.54778-1-wukaiyang2003@gmail.com> <5924d4fe-0b65-4525-9c76-9e1bd8c1989a@gmail.com> <2d147605-1557-4c18-a703-0faba3821bff@gmail.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:56:09 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1785315331025 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.223 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: KOTUYKAFAOA35OSW7TVDFDDY2RH23W6P X-Message-ID-Hash: KOTUYKAFAOA35OSW7TVDFDDY2RH23W6P X-MailFrom: m.sandoval@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Kaiyang Wu X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Kaiyang Wu writes: > Gentle ping. > > Kaiyang > > On 2026-07-13 11:16, Kaiyang Wu wrote: Thanks for the contribution (and ping). Could you please clarify this point? > Fedora ships 'sys-mount-{config,debug}.mount' units as static units, > which would cause the units failing on startup. 1. Which Fedora version did you try? 2. How (from where) did you obtain the Fedora container template? 3. Do the units always fail after booting the container? Or is there a more specific setup where they do? -- Maximiliano