From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C3F81FF145 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:04:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0E9F67B75; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:05:13 +0100 (CET) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Thomas Lamprecht Subject: Re: applied: [PATCH proxmox-i18n] update Simplified Chinese translations In-Reply-To: <92284865-dd01-4cfa-a398-a94d639d9510@proxmox.com> (Thomas Lamprecht's message of "Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:58:01 +0100") References: <20260130073139.248418-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> <20260204052055.544446-1-k.chai@proxmox.com> <20260204052055.544446-2-k.chai@proxmox.com> <92284865-dd01-4cfa-a398-a94d639d9510@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:05:06 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1770278629910 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.087 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: WVX76QSTGM5PO6DEZRH3D7XV2DFKAD2V X-Message-ID-Hash: WVX76QSTGM5PO6DEZRH3D7XV2DFKAD2V X-MailFrom: m.sandoval@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thomas Lamprecht writes: > Am 04.02.26 um 10:10 schrieb Kefu Chai: >> Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai >> --- >> zh_CN.po | 28898 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 13216 insertions(+), 15682 deletions(-) >> >> > > applied, thanks! > > Rebased the patch on the latest master and fixed up some issues in the PO > file though. There were a handful of duplicate mesgid's (might be a good > reason to add context to them for differentiation? Like for Pool with > Resource Pool vs. Storage Pool, @Maximiliano). Further, one plural variant > was wrong (wrongly used `msgstr` over the in such cases correct `msgstr[0]`). I'll take a look at those strings. -- Maximiliano