From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53D21FF15F for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:24:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9079818750; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:24:21 +0100 (CET) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Proxmox VE development discussion In-Reply-To: (Shannon Sterz's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:47:32 +0100") References: <20241121142809.332913-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 14:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.107 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] webhook edit: do not split translatable strings X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" "Shannon Sterz" writes: > wouldn't it be more elegant to simply define `addLabel` as > `gettext('Add')` and then override that where needed? that would safe > this akward ternary operator. haven't tested that though. Not sure to be honest. Whenever in doubt I try to leave the logic as close as possible to the original. If anyone feels somewhat strongly about this I can make a v2. -- Maximiliano _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel