From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A03B1FF189 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE73C2FCEE; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:33:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: (Maximiliano Sandoval's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:29:06 +0200") References: <20250829122442.390127-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <0708d5d2-a59e-4958-b409-4d8bdc01502e@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:33:08 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756992771600 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.099 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs] lvm storage: state snapshot-as-volume-chain is a technology preview X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Maximiliano Sandoval writes: > Thomas Lamprecht writes: > >> Am 29.08.25 um 14:24 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval: >>> This matches the description in the Changelog for Proxmox VE 9 [1]. >>> >>> [1] https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap#Proxmox_VE_9.0 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval >>> --- >>> pve-storage-lvm.adoc | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/pve-storage-lvm.adoc b/pve-storage-lvm.adoc >>> index 6928330..fc2a8ef 100644 >>> --- a/pve-storage-lvm.adoc >>> +++ b/pve-storage-lvm.adoc >>> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ The snapshot functionality is managed by the PVE storage system. >>> + >>> Enabling or disabling this flag only affects newly created virtual disk volumes. >>> >>> +WARNING: Snapshots as volume chains are currently a **technology preview** in {pve}. >> >> can we make this a note? It's not like tech. preview's are experimental >> and totally unsupported after all. >> >> Tangentially related: would be nice to get a short section describing the >> implications of what "technology preview" means and link to that here. > > As per the Proxmox VE subscription agreement page 2: > > "Technology previews are not supported in production environments." > > Of course this should also be in the documentation. I can make it a > note, but a warning matches better the tone of the agreement in my > opinion. I forgot to mention that the cases I found in the docs are either "WARNING" or "IMPORTANT". -- Maximiliano _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel