From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1D31FF187 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:08:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0D124EEF4; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:08:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:08:10 +0200 From: Wolfgang Bumiller To: Fiona Ebner Message-ID: References: <20250814130625.267960-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250814130625.267960-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756116486874 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.075 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server] live import: correctly generate blockdev X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" applied, thanks On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 03:06:00PM +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote: > The throttle node is generated later above the alloc-track block node, > so generating the alloc-track backing block node needs to happen with > 'no-throttle' to avoid a duplicate node name and avoid an additional > throttle node in the graph. > > Reported in the community forum: > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/169766/ > > Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner > --- > src/PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm > index 78cfad62..f263fedb 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm > @@ -7379,7 +7379,7 @@ sub live_import_from_files { > my ($interface, $index) = PVE::QemuServer::Drive::parse_drive_interface($dev); > my $drive = { file => $volid, interface => $interface, index => $index }; > my $blockdev = PVE::QemuServer::Blockdev::generate_drive_blockdev( > - $storecfg, $drive, $machine_version, {}, > + $storecfg, $drive, $machine_version, { 'no-throttle' => 1 }, > ); > $live_restore_backing->{$dev}->{blockdev} = $blockdev; > } else { > -- > 2.47.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel