From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0911FF16F
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:17:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1CBF1E134;
Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:16:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:16:19 +0100
From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <r3ueppeiqcwxy4zlhrofvwpvpsf5rphfhyqnnjc6f74habfve3@2hlzozjsmln3>
References: <20250312132025.7499-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20250312132025.7499-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.081 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-firewall v2 1/2] fix:
firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` to all chains
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
applied and s/nt_/nf_/ (except where referencing existing commit, to not
mess up copy&paste sesarches)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 02:20:24PM +0100, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> ... on the guest table. There is no reason to not repect that option
> on those two chains. These two were missed in the referenced commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
> Fixes: 64dc344b ("firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` option to guest table")
> Tested-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
> no changes since v1, so I kept @Stefans T-b and R-b
>
> proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> index 2dd7c48..30f7b4f 100644
> --- a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> +++ b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
> }
>
> chain pre-vm-out {
> - meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
> + meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : jump invalid-conntrack }
> }
>
> chain vm-out {
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
>
> chain before-bridge {
> meta protocol arp accept
> - meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
> + meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : jump invalid-conntrack }
> }
>
> chain forward {
> --
> 2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel