From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364D71FF16F
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:53:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 25E553855;
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:53:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:47:26 +0200
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <mailman.100.1742298955.416.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
<90b318c1-d6de-40c4-9709-2af76c064a71@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <90b318c1-d6de-40c4-9709-2af76c064a71@proxmox.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:53:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.992.1744710798.359.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Max Schettler via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Max Schettler <max@simplyblock.io>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Storage plugin questions
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7471722799421453737=="
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
--===============7471722799421453737==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <max@simplyblock.io>
X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8253AD5130
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:47:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 611DF36C6
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:47:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:47:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5ed43460d6bso8456015a12.0
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=simplyblock.io; s=google; t=1744710450; x=1745315250; darn=lists.proxmox.com;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from
:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=mbQyq9oNSynO4GfilJf+cxV/GxkxCPxUbp/DZpwEjQw=;
b=Wbaxgd1VAp63jxvRUDY48Ds9js4mPwoxtUa/FlzYAfDqeXHOXKeDT7tK4K4Nln7mFu
bPOjbvAP1HjNzKKhM67GitgsYp2wGDQvNV7fNJjJMvdWL7MR5Yt5Vn3EI3FHoVpaVG8z
g0yCAGQq/xtiWHEVwEtYbD5N5rzUt10/3Wgtt8jSPt2Ek/GJ57x4d64q4tM6+CH6y3mv
4RWIka3kXg3U0vjBSdIIimxiaEskUElxmRB79kXHJVRUHXi/bN66OIqoDKKbcnxiwAou
qbHS0ollfkgj70njDQMloCJ1zmxq1eN+lpQrpjqQWAuMljGyiDQQXeH5ZC6DVHAer1on
AlPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744710450; x=1745315250;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language
:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=mbQyq9oNSynO4GfilJf+cxV/GxkxCPxUbp/DZpwEjQw=;
b=p+IxElcuvgAMnEFFUI50pRK183QYL4OmMGxox17TtNvBYHYGYHJNAmfxDzSSV5q7ld
MpTZdAgd0mX64v34nHZCGmejwreOx4WkcsNI4bxkRfFi6M6hEkoa8/d8kPGnxmt0715b
9IlUM188zLxT4nhuE/XgBt9RIf+mocUAMSZ+TI47xWwowJNQiQSYBs68rHHpiMcyzFFM
1A9mDwfdK3eO8gPVDZpcsJX/EC5wddCRqvrpqp9irgCFIYBAoQ54JkLfvF0XKCSG6UV6
SqHuMkkNqPEviqJUIaGPlJuoQ64wtU0XtBdwtyDYc24PjNimR9B4BknmA5Vp/y/0z5vU
TiaQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWSOfj1e47JrfKZ4DNqxkAimQar6uwTJx64KhrRjDAn+wGgubnfxO3qIdMohIEKXFA3q2PI3xT0p+A=@lists.proxmox.com
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQa03aMfdTIY/rYn9dApznZBETrwbEKHdYcmGm4CV1qOOFpYVD
pKGCkSNY8cc9PQnI579jopzSqRHPxc+z66EA/2aJLU36JZTBDZHpbmTGPUdcTPr+Q1nQyYLIUt1
S
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuL0A2MpjOnznjV4qOcmeMhTVMN+SG3Txy7atlV0CnOQ07bUsAnJBTEMld5/nN
JOrRL9liKUT4CSpDazRZ7Q6lPNXxn6t1KyOd8FTTtJuHT8gLnQTGPzfvWoKu9I7ldn87JTxS45Q
zCGWAmciRm9qHd9g3tzk4vUgJWbSYUJnYSpgYzcgNgtHx/I2btHrknQKq+wFETQ2Xy6BYNA2TkP
UgthYQnDm5cyYvvOLdGwzo0vTpoOXpIGuEekhEKPxeXZ9EyQC+8LmrRRPCpYBSKE/zqamvHZmCe
bwl0xwmOD0MvalTBzxjm5dE5wOQijA7YW74WKDWaD8sfyPmla2ZadlgOIc0pNX5t7LQRrSnm/6l
zQXX2nbu+y06tag==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGt7oAyAmyt0CjnKLKfCRjSxIOWwGmAA1duLHRPthpDKsuOglBsenQoDhlo0ENHt2QynStmFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2344:b0:5e5:3610:8b59 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5f36f524ec7mr12725379a12.1.1744710450105;
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.179.132] (ip5f5bf29b.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [95.91.242.155])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5f459a32596sm1812532a12.65.2025.04.15.02.47.29
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 02:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <dea094a2-1d2a-4503-a372-154b7469f7e3@simplyblock.io>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:47:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Storage plugin questions
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <mailman.100.1742298955.416.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
<90b318c1-d6de-40c4-9709-2af76c064a71@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Max Schettler <max@simplyblock.io>
In-Reply-To: <90b318c1-d6de-40c4-9709-2af76c064a71@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com,simplyblock.io]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:53:18 +0200
On 21.03.25 15:45, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 18.03.25 um 11:32 schrieb Max Schettler via pve-devel:
>> - is it possible to integrate with the webinterface, to allow creation of a custom storage provider from there, instead of the CLI?
>
> Not yet and we can't give a timeline/promises, but others requested this
> as well, see:
> https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/D8E8OZGX1HI7.QH6MQS4GLOTI@proxmox.com/
Thanks for the pointer, I'll follow the list to be up-to-date with the
development.
>> - when an image is deleted, are derived snapshots supposed to be removed as well? Depending on the storage type this is a technical necessity, but if not, should it still be done? From the perspective of the storage provider it'd be difficult to prevent stale snapshots of deleted VMs to persist.
>
> Yes, storage snapshots (the ones created via volume_snapshot()) in
> Proxmox VE belong to the volume they are created with. And removing the
> volume should also remove those snapshots.
That makes sense, I had the impression, but depending on the storage
backend this is not a necessity.
Kind regards
Max
--===============7471722799421453737==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
--===============7471722799421453737==--