From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C901FF16E for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:33:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B9752F2; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:33:01 +0100 (CET) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:31:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> References: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Lou Lecrivain via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Lou Lecrivain X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 4/4] update tests following changes to behaviour: - allocating IPs also when prefix-only - PVE IPAM register details for every allocation strategy Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4781027866798789908==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============4781027866798789908== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1053C1881 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C849A18C for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-76.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([176.139.8.107]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id KbzytBjcilrsfKbzytPQZx; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:22 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr; s=t20230301; t=1733743942; bh=uER7q0OJwg5Met6FPARhkvCjFN/JYqYIYFyaj1DjGRE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=HlA2z38xLSVJYlU9ZzdQnwmWb8ywEvyGbELd/FOX2IFfUOaKuuq8KHii7I1mybprE 9cHLJPNUM1HP5YB6Yk+IwAea7lQZ2A/XsseMQ6XnrWNi2dDRJIOkkpoPKRwPtK/qhP snJwdcf/ep1gIAA5H1lbDrNL+QTuE0TSRXEJmXGHUSVHaQIDoNixDjEPmcYUPf7wxp OhnZaHuUCE5jcgeH3Iu9DfDOhXC/UGGfd0DhQbrdnPG88tTjgMfBgAeN41AAFQ3TOn LxHXbQQcz3mbRn1ghKMWeKvqsyOWMOeh/s6Pd/KNWaFDR6I24Xak2rWRVo3yHUemoR QyaKY5xp8TH2g== X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Auth: bG91LmxlY3JpdmFpbkBvcmFuZ2UuZnI= X-ME-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:22 +0100 X-ME-IP: 176.139.8.107 From: Lou Lecrivain To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com subject: SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 4/4] update tests following changes to behaviour: - allocating IPs also when prefix-only - PVE IPAM register details for every allocation strategy Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:31:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20241209113158.7343-5-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> References: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 4 AWL -0.095 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_REJECT 0.1 DMARC reject policy FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_REJECT 6 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has a DMARC reject policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 -0.01 Very Good reputation (+4) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Signed-off-by: lou lecrivain --- src/test/run_test_subnets.pl | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- src/test/run_test_vnets_blackbox.pl | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/test/run_test_subnets.pl b/src/test/run_test_subnets.pl index d1af0b3..79186c2 100755 --- a/src/test/run_test_subnets.pl +++ b/src/test/run_test_subnets.pl @@ -237,7 +237,13 @@ foreach my $path (@plugins) { . $ip . '":{"gateway":1},"' . $ipnextfree - . '":{},"' + . '":{"hostname":"' + . $hostname + . '","mac":"' + . $mac + . '","vmid":"' + . $vmid + . '"},"' . $ip2 . '":{"hostname":"' . $hostname @@ -268,7 +274,13 @@ foreach my $path (@plugins) { . $subnet_cidr . '":{"ips":{"' . $ipnextfree - . '":{},"' + . '":{"hostname":"' + . $hostname + . '","mac":"' + . $mac + . '","vmid":"' + . $vmid + . '"},"' . $ip2 . '":{"hostname":"' . $hostname @@ -328,7 +340,13 @@ foreach my $path (@plugins) { . $subnet_cidr . '":{"ips":{"' . $ipnextfree - . '":{},"' + . '":{"hostname":"' + . $hostname + . '","mac":"' + . $mac + . '","vmid":"' + . $vmid + . '"},"' . $ip2 . '":{"hostname":"' . $hostname diff --git a/src/test/run_test_vnets_blackbox.pl b/src/test/run_test_vnets_blackbox.pl index f7caca2..b79e1dc 100755 --- a/src/test/run_test_vnets_blackbox.pl +++ b/src/test/run_test_vnets_blackbox.pl @@ -413,7 +413,6 @@ sub test_nic_join { die "$test_name: we're expecting an array of subnets" if !$subnets; my $num_subnets = scalar $subnets->@*; die "$test_name: we're expecting an array of subnets. $num_subnets elements found" if ($num_subnets < 1); - my $num_dhcp_ranges = scalar grep { $_->{'dhcp-range'} } $subnets->@*; my $zoneid = "TESTZONE"; my $vnetid = "testvnet"; @@ -452,7 +451,7 @@ sub test_nic_join { my @ips = get_ips_from_mac($mac); my $num_ips = scalar @ips; - is ($num_ips, $num_dhcp_ranges, "$test_name: Expecting $num_dhcp_ranges IPs, found $num_ips"); + is ($num_ips, $num_subnets, "$test_name: Expecting $num_subnets IPs, found $num_ips"); ok ((all { ($_->{vnet} eq $vnetid && $_->{zone} eq $zoneid) } @ips), "$test_name: all IPs in correct vnet and zone" ); @@ -678,8 +677,7 @@ sub test_nic_start { die "$test_name: we're expecting an array of subnets" if !$subnets; my $num_subnets = scalar $subnets->@*; die "$test_name: we're expecting an array of subnets. $num_subnets elements found" if ($num_subnets < 1); - - $num_expected_ips = scalar grep { $_->{'dhcp-range'} } $subnets->@* if !defined $num_expected_ips; + $num_expected_ips = $num_subnets if !defined $num_expected_ips; my $zoneid = "TESTZONE"; my $vnetid = "testvnet"; -- 2.39.5 --===============4781027866798789908== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============4781027866798789908==--