From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6181FF179 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 02:55:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 91F521554A; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 02:55:58 +0100 (CET) References: <20251111071450.10188-1-alex@goodkind.io> <20251111071450.10188-2-alex@goodkind.io> <9959a910-d77f-4ea0-af17-42059ef35683@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:55:33 -0800 To: Thomas Lamprecht MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Alex Goodkind via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Alex Goodkind , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, tarick@bedeir.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container 1/1] fix #5538: network: enable accept_ra for DHCPv6 configurations Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4178943985128341811==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============4178943985128341811== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D12DD1FE for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 02:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6E6B71544D for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 02:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 02:55:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8823e39c581so4628886d6.3 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:55:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=goodkind.io; s=google; t=1762912545; x=1763517345; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zjpt3NmDA6SqCE0+gy6vyEOG7LVW33EkfsOasRwfD7c=; b=PygojoajgU+Fa0yGDN66hwj4nDrwb/vvw56z5V9fq4fXq9Rt8QVFrBHeTSCVZooOHI E7OIA+hCnOuIKL5Kj8TwA1znULs99/voQXgaQKawGxJipg+0EdMJ8Y0j/ybhPm5DI9Ic Uz/bNICQ3K985u24g5vZ8wKUA9YpVo7U2IIq8hCa0YS3Eq/69Y0ZoeeIlk4yO1jNMBB+ E8SrUYVE1mzRANVb1VWXfO7Cv3mkdVGFkt2Trkkm+EFMx+HlMeLmcmtEf2hrEknsvxcX 8mLpNwPXuTfUcTFzZukAMk7tjZpUuPQ421+Dg2vDFt5CsILmI8g97hSBMExef3JyKsgC bWFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762912545; x=1763517345; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zjpt3NmDA6SqCE0+gy6vyEOG7LVW33EkfsOasRwfD7c=; b=G681Z5JeWUqSWCcrktsDRxlw9ghWn6ht2+upkSFaTzQreS8Tq6T58mrwy06unQETqU 8thcVSKE0KzpmhQTvKHYscz8TkF5VvJVHL+oRPoTEgtwwt86EROzj81rwdEOmU0BUrwj wQT9PVtnFcrlxbVyd9D1ZcmaJUtkATuGlJRjTzlRNFRwTHn3qIwsh3yrbtmG30lXWiZj Wp4+KYAyNwJI2nq+9x8iSl7xG8HpOHnfD17lF7k2CrQpA16wK2+nGtFS8iQgO51CrlP3 dDsghRHd0NOxJGslyGQxbvM1C++5r/G5Qg9cRwHCAN0GFoSY7YgLlEnB3JkJJ6T15jQA Z9Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1FBO8Hzl/c2TQ0WGq29q/WZQXYwrtiiCfWw3dXYS24/Iu/3wF 8Ax7xifpiurRPYzkdm3q71MKySxtdUujypLDnn9/8XFwrJkFT7iC4r4JrMpCQNRyHTBUIbZ1ZbM fwCYTeUTlNYV7UwXIhV4OM+1QB66sMcvz0riAD6QbRA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv+uu97MXJqlvfrrdxY2Xtir4L0q4DosuWGluHvARXR52ausqHVS/lO8Jq+AoD 7CMEP0VCX4Qk1UnIFuUQ+oXBTHe4+e9SWuBkG7F90y+I2vfWpXn9p+UF/JBiXDb03m5uliXOYhJ UxO/K5ZChITnoDlLnc+oJFFYPFIsfMg0oCGwYxEYHmyPAbiTozdA+CLDcc88epRCxsAbFU9QK14 keFbuU4odwYiZ80kistu+4ai/VkaMIEFUz9cLUu2rA7/OMD4Uk9dtZ/tKIvNQYCqYCNt0s9ukDO dC3kkITUhzmicecG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDHAI1GOfvTdp2IxEZB0aLfWpZKRmtobs6wFDzmdfnp2UbaQE5htv6VAwS+2KBPtDp4Z5F8PF4skcJv3i6bpQ= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5f07:0:b0:880:3e03:3939 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-88271a440d9mr20549806d6.64.1762912544698; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:55:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20251111071450.10188-1-alex@goodkind.io> <20251111071450.10188-2-alex@goodkind.io> <9959a910-d77f-4ea0-af17-42059ef35683@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alex Goodkind Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:55:33 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bmY4Q5Ng4VEDrK4sRW5eYBnu4hctSHUrTdc2AO4ugtPcN8v1koL2BRqXQw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH container 1/1] fix #5538: network: enable accept_ra for DHCPv6 configurations To: Thomas Lamprecht Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, tarick@bedeir.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 What happens from here in terms of getting this merged? On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 09:02 Alex Goodkind wrote: > No problem, just sent the signed individual CLA to office@proxmox.com > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 07:46 Thomas Lamprecht > wrote: > >> Am 11.11.25 um 08:14 schrieb Alex Goodkind: >> > DHCPv6 requires Router Advertisements to function as specified in >> > the IPv6 standard. Previously, accept_ra was only enabled for 'auto' >> > mode, causing DHCPv6 configurations to fail when RAs were needed. >> > >> > Enable accept_ra for both 'auto' and 'dhcp' IPv6 modes. >> > >> >> Many thanks for your patch, looks alright. >> >> Would you mind sending in a signed CLA [0] for this? I know the change >> itself >> is relatively trivial, but we rather want to stay on the safe side here. >> >> [0]: >> https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation#Software_License_and_Copyright >> >> >> >> --===============4178943985128341811== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============4178943985128341811==--