From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A701FF165
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0A9123A856;
	Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:43 +0200
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250410105925.174008-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
 <5e4910e7-d5bc-49a2-b09b-c792009dd5e1@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e4910e7-d5bc-49a2-b09b-c792009dd5e1@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.916.1744287290.359.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Markus Frank via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix: also add resource mappings
 that do not exist to missing mappings
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9129571667796305821=="
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

--===============9129571667796305821==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <m.frank@proxmox.com>
X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 175ECD401C
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 012C63A82C
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0BA2144077
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <546be58f-8c82-435d-89fa-79cc0c278991@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:14:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix: also add resource mappings
 that do not exist to missing mappings
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250410105925.174008-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
 <5e4910e7-d5bc-49a2-b09b-c792009dd5e1@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e4910e7-d5bc-49a2-b09b-c792009dd5e1@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record



On  2025-04-10 13:18, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 10.04.25 um 12:59 schrieb Markus Frank:
>> Currently you get a "Can't use an undefined value..." error because all
>> get_node_mapping functions return undefined if there is no resource
>> mapping entry for the id.
>>
>> Fixes: a52eb3c4e ("check local resources: extend for mapped resources")
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> This patch supersedes "fix: print error message that the resource
>> mapping entry does not exist"
>>
>>   PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> index ccdceedc..2790942c 100644
>> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> @@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ sub check_local_resources {
>>   	    } elsif ($type eq 'dir') {
>>   		$entry = PVE::Mapping::Dir::get_node_mapping($dir_map, $id, $node);
>>   	    }
>> -	    if (!scalar($entry->@*)) {
>> +	    if (!$entry || !scalar($entry->@*)) {
>>   		push @{$missing_mappings_by_node->{$node}}, $key;
>>   	    }
>>   	}
> 
> Looking at this more closely, I think v1 is better actually. Sorry, I
> had misunderstood the exact situation when the issue happens.

I think this patch is actually better (especially for the WebUI).

When I use die, the error is printed in an error window, but the migration window is still open and I can start the migration (which immediately stops and shows the same error again).

With this patch, in the migration window, the key is printed as a mapped resource that is not available on the selected target, which is actually correct (because it is not defined for any node). And I cannot start the migration process.




--===============9129571667796305821==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

--===============9129571667796305821==--